Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grandiose ( talk · contribs) 17:09, 1 December 2011 (UTC) I'll be completing the rest of the review shortly, but I also foresee problems about the understandability of the prose here too, from a non-expert perspective. Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 17:09, 1 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The article needs a thorough copyedit. May I suggest the Guild's request page? Placed on hold for 7 days pending a substantial improvement in prose quality and understandability. Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 22:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

It's been about two weeks without further edits; should it be failed? Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 23:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I closed one of three similar nominations as failed but thought I'd give the other two just a couple more days for a reaction to my closing the first. Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 23:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

No further action, failing. Consider renominating when the above points have been addressed. Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 14:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply