This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikipedia entry says: As was standard in all Vulgate bibles until the 9th century, the Book of Baruch is absent[2] as is the Letter of Jeremiah
There are several issues here:
"It ... is the earliest complete one-volume Latin Bible to survive, only the León palimpsest being older". So is it, or is it not, the the earliest complete one-volume Latin Bible to survive?
This page contains plagiarized text directly from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04081a.htm. I am not skilled enough to flag the article, but will leave this so someone can edit the offending text.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pseudorious ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 9 December 2006.
Abbazia di Sant'Anthimo ≠ Abbazia di San Salvatore, Monte Amiata - fixed. HeartofaDog 22:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I note that the article - which chiefly reproduces that in the Catholic Encyclopedia, states that the Letter of Jermiah is present in Amiatinus - where my reading of Bogaert is that it is not - indeed that Lamentations (counted as part of Jeremiah) continues the text without a break. Can any other editor clarify? TomHennell ( talk)
In Codex Amiatinus, the Letter of Jeremiah is attached to the end of the Book of Jeremiah. As for Bogaert: Where? To which of his works are you referring? Mwidunn ( talk) 08:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)mwidunn
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Codex Amiatinus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://opac.bmlonline.it/Record.htm?record=120012494829When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikipedia entry says: As was standard in all Vulgate bibles until the 9th century, the Book of Baruch is absent[2] as is the Letter of Jeremiah
There are several issues here:
"It ... is the earliest complete one-volume Latin Bible to survive, only the León palimpsest being older". So is it, or is it not, the the earliest complete one-volume Latin Bible to survive?
This page contains plagiarized text directly from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04081a.htm. I am not skilled enough to flag the article, but will leave this so someone can edit the offending text.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pseudorious ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 9 December 2006.
Abbazia di Sant'Anthimo ≠ Abbazia di San Salvatore, Monte Amiata - fixed. HeartofaDog 22:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I note that the article - which chiefly reproduces that in the Catholic Encyclopedia, states that the Letter of Jermiah is present in Amiatinus - where my reading of Bogaert is that it is not - indeed that Lamentations (counted as part of Jeremiah) continues the text without a break. Can any other editor clarify? TomHennell ( talk)
In Codex Amiatinus, the Letter of Jeremiah is attached to the end of the Book of Jeremiah. As for Bogaert: Where? To which of his works are you referring? Mwidunn ( talk) 08:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)mwidunn
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Codex Amiatinus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://opac.bmlonline.it/Record.htm?record=120012494829When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)