This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
would be nice if somebody with the right to do so, could upload the logo. (as per ref)
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Design/src/branch/main/logo/icon/svg/codeberg-logo_icon_blue.svg No-bot-whatsoever ( talk) 13:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
The Gitea page talks only about the product, here we mention it as both a platform in the main section and as an organisation in the infobox, it probably should be one of those, I assume the intention was to describe the platform. Tranzystorek-io ( talk) 12:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
At an early stage in the creation of this draft somebody added a COI notice. I believe the article as written is entirely factual and has a neutral point of view. However, although I am not closely affiliated with Codeberg I am a donor, so I would prefer if somebody else could review and decide whether it is appropriate at this point to remove the template. (edit: For clarity: I did not create this draft, but I have contributed to it.) SkipperGeek ( talk) 12:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
The second paragraph in the Reception section cites articles that supposedly indicate visibility increase and project migrations that happened "as a result" of the June 2022 "Give Up Github" campaign, but the following are not logically consistent with that statement:
These are still probably valid proofs for Codeberg popularity, but should be separated factually from the anti-github campaign. Tranzystorek-io ( talk) 18:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Someone's repo got removed; they eventually posted this:
In there, they alleged that one of codeberg's staff got added to cloudflare's helpers, then that repo got taken down and the repo's host was issued an email from Codeberg, alleging "libel" on the host's part. Any research would be good. Correct me if I am wrong. ( talk) 15:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
would be nice if somebody with the right to do so, could upload the logo. (as per ref)
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Design/src/branch/main/logo/icon/svg/codeberg-logo_icon_blue.svg No-bot-whatsoever ( talk) 13:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
The Gitea page talks only about the product, here we mention it as both a platform in the main section and as an organisation in the infobox, it probably should be one of those, I assume the intention was to describe the platform. Tranzystorek-io ( talk) 12:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
At an early stage in the creation of this draft somebody added a COI notice. I believe the article as written is entirely factual and has a neutral point of view. However, although I am not closely affiliated with Codeberg I am a donor, so I would prefer if somebody else could review and decide whether it is appropriate at this point to remove the template. (edit: For clarity: I did not create this draft, but I have contributed to it.) SkipperGeek ( talk) 12:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
The second paragraph in the Reception section cites articles that supposedly indicate visibility increase and project migrations that happened "as a result" of the June 2022 "Give Up Github" campaign, but the following are not logically consistent with that statement:
These are still probably valid proofs for Codeberg popularity, but should be separated factually from the anti-github campaign. Tranzystorek-io ( talk) 18:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Someone's repo got removed; they eventually posted this:
In there, they alleged that one of codeberg's staff got added to cloudflare's helpers, then that repo got taken down and the repo's host was issued an email from Codeberg, alleging "libel" on the host's part. Any research would be good. Correct me if I am wrong. ( talk) 15:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)