Sounds like a vanity page, but we could always use more typefaces. -- Ardonik 23:11, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
If properly constructed in a neutral way, this page would begin by describing the Code2000 character set, including its historical basis and its relationship to Unicode. It would then list all possible sources of Code2000 fonts, including the Kass font, and it would provide links to all these sources.
It should not mention that the Kass font is a shareware product unless it does so uniformly for all the other fonts it mentions.
-- BlairRMartin 15:15, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
Greetings. This article mentions the Free Software Foundation fonts, but what are those? My curiosty led me to look through all of the FSF site and I found nothing regarding those. Do they exist? If yes, shouldn't an article be written about them? As in, another user aside me might want information in that matter. -- Saoshyant 00:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
I downloaded Code2002 so I can properly see
this page. Problem is, where do I unzip it to? I have
Windows XP Home Edition with
Service Pack 2.
Oopsie. Forgot my sig. --
Admiral Roo 17:34, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\LanguagePack] "SURROGATE"=dword:00000002 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\LanguagePack\SurrogateFallback] "Plane1"="Code2001" "Plane2"="Code2002" "Plane15"="Code2001" [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\International\Scripts\42] "IEPropFontName"="Code2001"
(Scratches head) Maybe I should merge these two talk pages into on of the talk pages and put a redirect link on the other talk page so WE don't have to scan both talk pages for updates. Opinions? -- Admiral Roo 18:17, August 5, 2005 (UTC) This is what I did step by step.
-- Admiral Roo 18:22, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Merged all content from Talk:Unicode#Having_some_trouble to here.
I just downloaded Code2002 to see this page correctly. Normally, I am vary good at knowing where to put files in my computers. However, this is the first time I downloaded a True Type Font, and I don't know where to put it. I have Windows XP Home Editoion with Service Pack 2. I have a special folder on my desktop that I download to whenever I download free EXE files or ZIP files, and when I unzipped Code2002, it only came with the TTF file, but no instructions on where to put it. Thanks for your time in reading this. -- Admiral Roo 17:42, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Look, I know the question marks are the result of my browser/font combination not rendering Unicode properly, but arguably the second question mark ought to be a picture, not a character. You want to display a glyph, after all. It's silly to expect me to have Code2000 installed just so I can read the criticism in its article properly. 81.58.51.131 08:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I removed this from the article:
because it seems to be based on an old version of the font. The particular example for an incorrect glyph is now correctly displayed, and as far as I can tell half of the characters aren't missing.
Besides, it looks like it was original research to begin with. -- Ptcamn 14:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone know where I can still download Code2000? It seems because he wanted to be paid, the author put the file on very few websites, and his is down (old and on the new site the downloading doesn't work). The last version is 1.16. 81.57.43.204 11:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
And how many people have Code2000 installed ? 0.1% ? A picture is the only reasonable way. Taw 04:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
it's possible that the article needs more criticism, but the notability of the font is not in question. It's our first choice for {{ unicode}} on MediaWiki:Common.css, which in itself establishes notability (Wikipedia is among the top-ten or so websites now). The font is your first choice if you don't care about free licenses, and if you don't want to pay through your nose. dab (𒁳) 06:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Surprised that I couldn't find an existing article on this font and Code2000 redirected to Unicode typefaces. -- A12n 16:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
deletion has been overturned -- Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_16.
A second nomination for deletion resulted in a speedy keep; all comments apart from the original nomination were to keep. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code2000 (second nomination). — Duae Quartunciae ( talk · cont) 02:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
James Kass has some unexplained break:
because his font development is suddenly halted. 83.7.242.254 ( talk) 15:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Erm, James Kass' website is down ( http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/code2000.net) and yet it is not expired ( http://reports.internic.net/cgi/whois?whois_nic=code2000.net&type=domain). Should we wait till August to report the complete death of this project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Espadrine ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Where is the official website now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaditya 7 ( talk • contribs) 04:24, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
It is listed NOW at article's bottom, where you can download final version, stripped from beta additions. 80.232.240.49 ( talk) 10:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
213.106.114.78 ( talk) 22:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
As of 1 September, http://www.code2000.net is now up, but it is NOT site of James Kass! Instead it is spamlist full of advertising. So we now finally stick with sourceforge. 85.17.190.71 ( talk) 16:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Similar discussion: https://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.apl/browse_thread/thread/8b5151085e9d277d/aba55acfc21e4f0e?hl=pl&lnk=gst Let's anyone know that this is fake. 50.22.181.250 ( talk) 20:18, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Shutdown reasons: http://www.mail-archive.com/unicode@unicode.org/msg29951.html
Sounds like a vanity page, but we could always use more typefaces. -- Ardonik 23:11, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
If properly constructed in a neutral way, this page would begin by describing the Code2000 character set, including its historical basis and its relationship to Unicode. It would then list all possible sources of Code2000 fonts, including the Kass font, and it would provide links to all these sources.
It should not mention that the Kass font is a shareware product unless it does so uniformly for all the other fonts it mentions.
-- BlairRMartin 15:15, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
Greetings. This article mentions the Free Software Foundation fonts, but what are those? My curiosty led me to look through all of the FSF site and I found nothing regarding those. Do they exist? If yes, shouldn't an article be written about them? As in, another user aside me might want information in that matter. -- Saoshyant 00:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
I downloaded Code2002 so I can properly see
this page. Problem is, where do I unzip it to? I have
Windows XP Home Edition with
Service Pack 2.
Oopsie. Forgot my sig. --
Admiral Roo 17:34, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\LanguagePack] "SURROGATE"=dword:00000002 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\LanguagePack\SurrogateFallback] "Plane1"="Code2001" "Plane2"="Code2002" "Plane15"="Code2001" [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\International\Scripts\42] "IEPropFontName"="Code2001"
(Scratches head) Maybe I should merge these two talk pages into on of the talk pages and put a redirect link on the other talk page so WE don't have to scan both talk pages for updates. Opinions? -- Admiral Roo 18:17, August 5, 2005 (UTC) This is what I did step by step.
-- Admiral Roo 18:22, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Merged all content from Talk:Unicode#Having_some_trouble to here.
I just downloaded Code2002 to see this page correctly. Normally, I am vary good at knowing where to put files in my computers. However, this is the first time I downloaded a True Type Font, and I don't know where to put it. I have Windows XP Home Editoion with Service Pack 2. I have a special folder on my desktop that I download to whenever I download free EXE files or ZIP files, and when I unzipped Code2002, it only came with the TTF file, but no instructions on where to put it. Thanks for your time in reading this. -- Admiral Roo 17:42, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Look, I know the question marks are the result of my browser/font combination not rendering Unicode properly, but arguably the second question mark ought to be a picture, not a character. You want to display a glyph, after all. It's silly to expect me to have Code2000 installed just so I can read the criticism in its article properly. 81.58.51.131 08:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I removed this from the article:
because it seems to be based on an old version of the font. The particular example for an incorrect glyph is now correctly displayed, and as far as I can tell half of the characters aren't missing.
Besides, it looks like it was original research to begin with. -- Ptcamn 14:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone know where I can still download Code2000? It seems because he wanted to be paid, the author put the file on very few websites, and his is down (old and on the new site the downloading doesn't work). The last version is 1.16. 81.57.43.204 11:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
And how many people have Code2000 installed ? 0.1% ? A picture is the only reasonable way. Taw 04:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
it's possible that the article needs more criticism, but the notability of the font is not in question. It's our first choice for {{ unicode}} on MediaWiki:Common.css, which in itself establishes notability (Wikipedia is among the top-ten or so websites now). The font is your first choice if you don't care about free licenses, and if you don't want to pay through your nose. dab (𒁳) 06:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Surprised that I couldn't find an existing article on this font and Code2000 redirected to Unicode typefaces. -- A12n 16:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
deletion has been overturned -- Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_16.
A second nomination for deletion resulted in a speedy keep; all comments apart from the original nomination were to keep. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code2000 (second nomination). — Duae Quartunciae ( talk · cont) 02:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
James Kass has some unexplained break:
because his font development is suddenly halted. 83.7.242.254 ( talk) 15:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Erm, James Kass' website is down ( http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/code2000.net) and yet it is not expired ( http://reports.internic.net/cgi/whois?whois_nic=code2000.net&type=domain). Should we wait till August to report the complete death of this project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Espadrine ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Where is the official website now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaditya 7 ( talk • contribs) 04:24, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
It is listed NOW at article's bottom, where you can download final version, stripped from beta additions. 80.232.240.49 ( talk) 10:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
213.106.114.78 ( talk) 22:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
As of 1 September, http://www.code2000.net is now up, but it is NOT site of James Kass! Instead it is spamlist full of advertising. So we now finally stick with sourceforge. 85.17.190.71 ( talk) 16:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Similar discussion: https://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.apl/browse_thread/thread/8b5151085e9d277d/aba55acfc21e4f0e?hl=pl&lnk=gst Let's anyone know that this is fake. 50.22.181.250 ( talk) 20:18, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Shutdown reasons: http://www.mail-archive.com/unicode@unicode.org/msg29951.html