This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Charge pumps are fairly complex devices made with a DC-AC converter (something like this) and another stage (something like this or something inductor/capacitor based). Essentially charge pump is the commercial name for small DC-DC converters and here are some examples. -- Femmina 21:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
It would be good to have a schematic/circuit diagram. The text doesn't convey the simplicity of the scheme. Sangwine 20:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Is this device also known as an "impulse generator"? Whogue 02:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Is this device also known as "Villardschaltungen" in german (english "Villard circuit")? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.153.69.41 ( talk) 09:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
It appears that the SVG version of the image "A simple two-stage CW multiplier" currently showing on this article has half of the diodes pointed the wrong way. I found an older PNG version of the same image with them pointing at what I believe is the correct way.
SoCo cpp ( talk) 00:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
The older version is definitely correct. see http://www.blazelabs.com/e-exp15.asp and http://www.electronicspoint.com/voltage-multipliers-t222870.html for examples. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 04:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Blaze Labs is an independent researcher who does not use peer-reviewed journals to publish. I am unaware of any verification of their experiments through peer review or an independent body trying to replicate these results. [10] Nasageek16 ( talk) 06:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
It reads now "The output voltage is twice the peak input voltage multiplied by the number of stages N " There is am error here in the multistage double formula: the double pro stage leads to 2 to the POWER of N times the initial voltage swing as total resulting voltage instead (2x2x2x....) of 2 TIMES N times the initial voltage swing. The formula should read V =2^N*V0 2A02:1811:CE10:D500:464:8C75:B63F:4DBF ( talk) 09:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a good article on the voltage multiplier that C-W used for their experiment, but there should be, somewhere, an article on the experiment itself. That is, the accelerator, what they did with it, and how it works other than the parts described here. Gah4 ( talk) 01:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Seems to me that the usual voltage doubler is the lowest order of CW. Recent edit summary seems to indicate that those are used in microwave ovens, but don't count. Also, it doesn't matter where the ground symbol is, the circuit works the same way. Gah4 ( talk) 13:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Charge pumps are fairly complex devices made with a DC-AC converter (something like this) and another stage (something like this or something inductor/capacitor based). Essentially charge pump is the commercial name for small DC-DC converters and here are some examples. -- Femmina 21:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
It would be good to have a schematic/circuit diagram. The text doesn't convey the simplicity of the scheme. Sangwine 20:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Is this device also known as an "impulse generator"? Whogue 02:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Is this device also known as "Villardschaltungen" in german (english "Villard circuit")? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.153.69.41 ( talk) 09:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
It appears that the SVG version of the image "A simple two-stage CW multiplier" currently showing on this article has half of the diodes pointed the wrong way. I found an older PNG version of the same image with them pointing at what I believe is the correct way.
SoCo cpp ( talk) 00:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
The older version is definitely correct. see http://www.blazelabs.com/e-exp15.asp and http://www.electronicspoint.com/voltage-multipliers-t222870.html for examples. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 04:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Blaze Labs is an independent researcher who does not use peer-reviewed journals to publish. I am unaware of any verification of their experiments through peer review or an independent body trying to replicate these results. [10] Nasageek16 ( talk) 06:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
It reads now "The output voltage is twice the peak input voltage multiplied by the number of stages N " There is am error here in the multistage double formula: the double pro stage leads to 2 to the POWER of N times the initial voltage swing as total resulting voltage instead (2x2x2x....) of 2 TIMES N times the initial voltage swing. The formula should read V =2^N*V0 2A02:1811:CE10:D500:464:8C75:B63F:4DBF ( talk) 09:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a good article on the voltage multiplier that C-W used for their experiment, but there should be, somewhere, an article on the experiment itself. That is, the accelerator, what they did with it, and how it works other than the parts described here. Gah4 ( talk) 01:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Seems to me that the usual voltage doubler is the lowest order of CW. Recent edit summary seems to indicate that those are used in microwave ovens, but don't count. Also, it doesn't matter where the ground symbol is, the circuit works the same way. Gah4 ( talk) 13:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC)