This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anatomy: Gross Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

This is an article on coccyxal fossa with ref from new sci book. No need for deletion. -- 79.101.179.228 ( talk) 20:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Incorrect. The cited reference is to a 1918 edition of Gray's Anatomy. I have inserted a link to an online edition so that editors can assure themselves this term is not mentioned anywhere within its 1,402 pages. I'm no anatomist, but suspect this term could well be a case of original research or WP:TOOSOON, and possibly even a little bit of WP:COI, though I'm always happy to be proved wrong. See: this self-published book (www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?contributorId=1512343) by author, Lepota L. Cosmo, published 16 Aug 2017. (Article page was created on 14 Aug). I think further references and expert input really is needed to establish if WP:GNG has actually been met. Regards from the UK Nick Moyes ( talk) 01:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Small stub covered on Coccyx page - shall merge there. -- Iztwoz ( talk) 05:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC) reply