Hi, and thanks for nominating
Cobra Kai (season 2) for Good Article status. I'm planning on reviewing it. I might have some comments on the article and may need you to do some adjustments to the article so, if I do, please keep up to date on your Talk page/notifications.Also, please remember this process may take up to 7 days. Remember, Imurmate
I'ma editor2022 (
talk)
18:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Does not cite any sources in " Episodes " section ( which is only necessary for date and "Directed by"/"Written by" and preferrably release date), " Track listing "," La-La Land Records bonus tracks ", and " Cast and characters sections ". Sources are verifiable and good but few in those sections. But citations are plentiful for everywhere else.
Please add citations to verify information in the above sections which I have stated, otherwise I think it could be a great, no Good article! I will give you 7 days to repair the article to
GA standard. That will be until Jan.25
Well, i'm not going to act pretentious, because this is my first review for GA nomination, but I consulted a
GA mentor, and I got the suggestions from him. If you wish, you can get the discussion
here. Also, the specific information (not the synopsis of each episode), does need citations to remain verifiable (when I say "specific information" I mean dates,"Directed by"/"Written by", release dates, and so on as stated above). | Remember, Imurmate
I'ma editor2022 (
talk)
19:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't mean this in a rude way, but as I stated this isn't my first GA nomination. In no other nomination have I ever been asked to verify the director or writer, these credits are given within the episode.
Grey's Anatomy (season 17) is a featured article, or an article that represents Wikipedia's best work, that I worked extensively on. Eight people reviewed it, and not one questioned the director or writing credits. The air date is only sourced there from when the season was still airing, because future dates need a source.
Homicide: Life on the Street (season 1),
Parks and Recreation (season 1),
Smallville (season 1),
Supernatural (season 1), and
True Detective (season 1), are all further examples of featured articles that do not have sources in these places. I will mention that from a quick glance it does not appear the editor you reached out to is familiar with television-related articles. There's nothing wrong with that, everyone has their preferred areas of editing, but it does mean they may not be knowledgeable in
MOS:TV.
TheDoctorWho(talk)22:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Ok, I suppose I can give a Pass for GA reviewership, since I have reviewed the
MOS:TV and it says not applicable/negligible information on references and citations (I will say though that I did read the MOS:TV before), and that there is a section on references, but I will say it is
extremely short, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and give you a Pass. | Remember, Imurmate
I'ma editor2022 (
talk)
00:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the pass and reviewing the article. I hope I didn't give you too much trouble for your first review
. If you choose to review any other television articles and have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to me and I'll try to assist! Hope you have a great day
. Thanks,
TheDoctorWho(talk)00:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Hi, and thanks for nominating
Cobra Kai (season 2) for Good Article status. I'm planning on reviewing it. I might have some comments on the article and may need you to do some adjustments to the article so, if I do, please keep up to date on your Talk page/notifications.Also, please remember this process may take up to 7 days. Remember, Imurmate
I'ma editor2022 (
talk)
18:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Does not cite any sources in " Episodes " section ( which is only necessary for date and "Directed by"/"Written by" and preferrably release date), " Track listing "," La-La Land Records bonus tracks ", and " Cast and characters sections ". Sources are verifiable and good but few in those sections. But citations are plentiful for everywhere else.
Please add citations to verify information in the above sections which I have stated, otherwise I think it could be a great, no Good article! I will give you 7 days to repair the article to
GA standard. That will be until Jan.25
Well, i'm not going to act pretentious, because this is my first review for GA nomination, but I consulted a
GA mentor, and I got the suggestions from him. If you wish, you can get the discussion
here. Also, the specific information (not the synopsis of each episode), does need citations to remain verifiable (when I say "specific information" I mean dates,"Directed by"/"Written by", release dates, and so on as stated above). | Remember, Imurmate
I'ma editor2022 (
talk)
19:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't mean this in a rude way, but as I stated this isn't my first GA nomination. In no other nomination have I ever been asked to verify the director or writer, these credits are given within the episode.
Grey's Anatomy (season 17) is a featured article, or an article that represents Wikipedia's best work, that I worked extensively on. Eight people reviewed it, and not one questioned the director or writing credits. The air date is only sourced there from when the season was still airing, because future dates need a source.
Homicide: Life on the Street (season 1),
Parks and Recreation (season 1),
Smallville (season 1),
Supernatural (season 1), and
True Detective (season 1), are all further examples of featured articles that do not have sources in these places. I will mention that from a quick glance it does not appear the editor you reached out to is familiar with television-related articles. There's nothing wrong with that, everyone has their preferred areas of editing, but it does mean they may not be knowledgeable in
MOS:TV.
TheDoctorWho(talk)22:25, 22 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Ok, I suppose I can give a Pass for GA reviewership, since I have reviewed the
MOS:TV and it says not applicable/negligible information on references and citations (I will say though that I did read the MOS:TV before), and that there is a section on references, but I will say it is
extremely short, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and give you a Pass. | Remember, Imurmate
I'ma editor2022 (
talk)
00:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the pass and reviewing the article. I hope I didn't give you too much trouble for your first review
. If you choose to review any other television articles and have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to me and I'll try to assist! Hope you have a great day
. Thanks,
TheDoctorWho(talk)00:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply