This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative
project to organize and improve articles related to
mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the
project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the
discussion, or
join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This is looking in very good order, minimal nitpicks.
Lead
but the true death toll may be higher. : could be me, but "true" seems to imply that the authorities were lying. Perhaps "actual" may be a better term to use?
Done.
Background
The first sentence of the 3rd paragraph is quite long with several commas, suggest breaking it up.
Split and slightly revised.
Explosions
At about 9:30 a.m. on May 27, 1925 the...: comma after 1925 I think?
Done.
Response and effects
It arrived in Raleigh the following day.: where is Raleigh relative to the mine site, link if possible too?
Working on this. The car apparently made it all the way to Coal Glen (
news article), and once I find a source discussing its arrival there there will be little need to mention its stop in Raleigh.
Resolved, the car came to Coal Glen on May 28.
Legacy
Doing the source checks, ref 27 says there were a couple of fatalities after the mine reopened and ref 28 says 14; is this worth mentioning?
Sources
The print sources appear to be reputable publishers, and the journal ref is associated with a university
Did a spotcheck on refs 1, 24, 27 and 28, and these look fine
Other stuff
Image tags OK
No dupe links
That's it for me. Cheers,
Zawed (
talk) 09:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Hi Indy Beetle, just checking in on the progress of this. It is my understanding you are still working on this? Cheers,
Zawed (
talk) 10:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Sorry yes I'll get on it, these past few days have been busier than I anticipated. -
Indy beetle (
talk) 09:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)reply
No worries, I appreciate that my chase up was somewhat ironic given the length of time it took for me to review the article to begin with!
Zawed (
talk) 10:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Looks good, passing as GA as I believe this meets the necessary criteria.
Zawed (
talk) 10:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative
project to organize and improve articles related to
mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the
project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the
discussion, or
join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This is looking in very good order, minimal nitpicks.
Lead
but the true death toll may be higher. : could be me, but "true" seems to imply that the authorities were lying. Perhaps "actual" may be a better term to use?
Done.
Background
The first sentence of the 3rd paragraph is quite long with several commas, suggest breaking it up.
Split and slightly revised.
Explosions
At about 9:30 a.m. on May 27, 1925 the...: comma after 1925 I think?
Done.
Response and effects
It arrived in Raleigh the following day.: where is Raleigh relative to the mine site, link if possible too?
Working on this. The car apparently made it all the way to Coal Glen (
news article), and once I find a source discussing its arrival there there will be little need to mention its stop in Raleigh.
Resolved, the car came to Coal Glen on May 28.
Legacy
Doing the source checks, ref 27 says there were a couple of fatalities after the mine reopened and ref 28 says 14; is this worth mentioning?
Sources
The print sources appear to be reputable publishers, and the journal ref is associated with a university
Did a spotcheck on refs 1, 24, 27 and 28, and these look fine
Other stuff
Image tags OK
No dupe links
That's it for me. Cheers,
Zawed (
talk) 09:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Hi Indy Beetle, just checking in on the progress of this. It is my understanding you are still working on this? Cheers,
Zawed (
talk) 10:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Sorry yes I'll get on it, these past few days have been busier than I anticipated. -
Indy beetle (
talk) 09:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)reply
No worries, I appreciate that my chase up was somewhat ironic given the length of time it took for me to review the article to begin with!
Zawed (
talk) 10:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Looks good, passing as GA as I believe this meets the necessary criteria.
Zawed (
talk) 10:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply