![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
This whole thing reads like a puff piece by a Disney ad exec. There's even a quote about what "Disney believes." Give me a break. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.250.181.124 ( talk) 17:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Is anyone going to put up works cited? Like the waiting list, is there actual proof of it being 10 years? What sources were used? It really doesn't belong on Wikipedia w/o sources.-- 68.97.75.170 18:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
A Bloomberg News report by Andy Fixmer gives nine years for the waiting list. (Article revised to include that info.) DL77 12:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Bloomberg News says the animatronic bird in the wood-paneled dining room is a California turkey vulture. DL77 12:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Also, L.A. Times report of June 21 describes it as a vulture rather than a condor. DL77 13:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Based on what the Disneyland Resort spokesman Bob Tucker told Kimi Yoshino of the L.A. Times, the initiation fee on the corporate level has increased $5,000 over what had been listed on Wikipedia and the corporate annual fee raised $100. The individual fees are the same as what was indicated in the Wikipedia article. Tucker didn't mention any other levels, however, nor a fee for associate members on the corporate level. DL77 13:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 08:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
First of all I fail to see how an article on a private club with a closed membership list can be an advertisement. It's not as though this was written by someone working for Disney trying to recruit new members. They have more people waiting than will ever be able to become members. Second, if the majority of available non-hearsay information is from Disney press releases and such, wouldn't that naturally color the tone of the article? Until other legitimate sources are found, there's just no way to avoid that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdring ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
This whole thing reads like a puff piece by a Disney ad exec. There's even a quote about what "Disney believes." Give me a break. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.250.181.124 ( talk) 17:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Is anyone going to put up works cited? Like the waiting list, is there actual proof of it being 10 years? What sources were used? It really doesn't belong on Wikipedia w/o sources.-- 68.97.75.170 18:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
A Bloomberg News report by Andy Fixmer gives nine years for the waiting list. (Article revised to include that info.) DL77 12:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Bloomberg News says the animatronic bird in the wood-paneled dining room is a California turkey vulture. DL77 12:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Also, L.A. Times report of June 21 describes it as a vulture rather than a condor. DL77 13:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Based on what the Disneyland Resort spokesman Bob Tucker told Kimi Yoshino of the L.A. Times, the initiation fee on the corporate level has increased $5,000 over what had been listed on Wikipedia and the corporate annual fee raised $100. The individual fees are the same as what was indicated in the Wikipedia article. Tucker didn't mention any other levels, however, nor a fee for associate members on the corporate level. DL77 13:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 08:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
First of all I fail to see how an article on a private club with a closed membership list can be an advertisement. It's not as though this was written by someone working for Disney trying to recruit new members. They have more people waiting than will ever be able to become members. Second, if the majority of available non-hearsay information is from Disney press releases and such, wouldn't that naturally color the tone of the article? Until other legitimate sources are found, there's just no way to avoid that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdring ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)