This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carolynhuddy.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
If I'm right, this bacteria has recently been renamed. But why also Wikidata code? I was surprised that the English article was not in the list of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q56290719. Why can't the article in English be in the same list? It's still the same, right? Please, help me! Calle Widmann ( talk) 05:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
For inter-wiki links to show up, all the wikis have to be linked to exactly the same Wikidata item. So we would need to link en:Clostridioides difficile (bacteria) to Clostridium difficile (Q310543), not Clostridioides difficile Lawson et al. 2016 (Q56290719). The problem is that although these two Wikidata items claim that they are instances of a taxon, they are not (and this is well known at Wikidata). They are instances of a taxon name. Our article is at the taxon name Clostridiodes difficile and so should be linked to the Wikidata item for that name. As and when the other language wikis update their taxonomy, then the links to their articles can be moved to Clostridioides difficile Lawson et al. 2016 (Q56290719). Apart from anything else, when we don't link to the correctly named Wikidata item, the taxonbar does not behave properly.
Wikidata has been asked repeatedly to fix the problem. When two taxon name items are said to be taxonomic synonyms, then all the language wikis should be linked together. So far there has been no response to this request. Peter coxhead ( talk) 20:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Surely the article title should be "Clostridioides difficile (bacterium)"? We don't put animal taxa needing disambiguation at "... (animals)" or plant taxa needing disambiguation at "... (plants)". Peter coxhead ( talk) 20:48, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect C. difficile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#C. difficile until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
This should have a section, but creating one is far beyond my skill set. Fxmastermind ( talk) 12:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Si dificile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Si dificile until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew ( talk) 16:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carolynhuddy.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
If I'm right, this bacteria has recently been renamed. But why also Wikidata code? I was surprised that the English article was not in the list of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q56290719. Why can't the article in English be in the same list? It's still the same, right? Please, help me! Calle Widmann ( talk) 05:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
For inter-wiki links to show up, all the wikis have to be linked to exactly the same Wikidata item. So we would need to link en:Clostridioides difficile (bacteria) to Clostridium difficile (Q310543), not Clostridioides difficile Lawson et al. 2016 (Q56290719). The problem is that although these two Wikidata items claim that they are instances of a taxon, they are not (and this is well known at Wikidata). They are instances of a taxon name. Our article is at the taxon name Clostridiodes difficile and so should be linked to the Wikidata item for that name. As and when the other language wikis update their taxonomy, then the links to their articles can be moved to Clostridioides difficile Lawson et al. 2016 (Q56290719). Apart from anything else, when we don't link to the correctly named Wikidata item, the taxonbar does not behave properly.
Wikidata has been asked repeatedly to fix the problem. When two taxon name items are said to be taxonomic synonyms, then all the language wikis should be linked together. So far there has been no response to this request. Peter coxhead ( talk) 20:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Surely the article title should be "Clostridioides difficile (bacterium)"? We don't put animal taxa needing disambiguation at "... (animals)" or plant taxa needing disambiguation at "... (plants)". Peter coxhead ( talk) 20:48, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect C. difficile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#C. difficile until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
This should have a section, but creating one is far beyond my skill set. Fxmastermind ( talk) 12:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Si dificile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Si dificile until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew ( talk) 16:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)