This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of
hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Because of your numerous amazing reviews of my articles, I will take this on. At first glance it looks good.
LOVI33 02:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
LOVI33 Thanks a lot, cannot wait to see your comments. --
K. Peake 08:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
Are you sure
Gospel should be included as a genre since it specifically refers to it's chorus?
Shouldn't it be fine to include as a genre since not only is the chorus included more than once but it is not described as merely "influence" from, or "elements" of gospel? --
K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
"songwriting credit was added" → "a songwriting credit was added"
Shouldn't he be mentioned as "West" instead of "Kanye"?
See
MOS:SAMESURNAME, or is this not following that MOS rule properly and should it be "Kanye West" instead? --
K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
There are a few unarchived citations, but the rest look good.
External links
Looks Good!
Final comments and verdict
As always, the article is really well written. I'm going to put it On hold for now. Just a few small fixes, shouldn't take too long.
LOVI33 15:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
LOVI33 Thanks for the review and proper feedback, have made some comments to you regarding it though. --
K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake, you had good reasons for not applying some of my suggestions so I'm going to ✓Pass it. Great Job!
LOVI33 16:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Ballad?
A review quoted in the article says "Closed on Sunday" is a ballads. May I add the article to the category "2010s ballads?"
MagicatthemovieS (
talk) 21:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)MagicatthemovieSreply
Just for anyone who is not aware of the full context, the review is the only source that says the single is a ballad; I tried searching the internet for others but could not find any more RS that say that, plus this is in the Critical reception section. Thought I'd point out to help awareness, though I appreciate the user being constructive and posting this on the talk page. --
K. Peake 10:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Good article, long enough, well-referenced, no copy-vios detected, hook cited-inline / interesting, no QPQ needed as this is the nominator’s third nomination. Good to go!
Ashleyyoursmile! 06:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of
hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Because of your numerous amazing reviews of my articles, I will take this on. At first glance it looks good.
LOVI33 02:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
LOVI33 Thanks a lot, cannot wait to see your comments. --
K. Peake 08:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
Are you sure
Gospel should be included as a genre since it specifically refers to it's chorus?
Shouldn't it be fine to include as a genre since not only is the chorus included more than once but it is not described as merely "influence" from, or "elements" of gospel? --
K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
"songwriting credit was added" → "a songwriting credit was added"
Shouldn't he be mentioned as "West" instead of "Kanye"?
See
MOS:SAMESURNAME, or is this not following that MOS rule properly and should it be "Kanye West" instead? --
K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
There are a few unarchived citations, but the rest look good.
External links
Looks Good!
Final comments and verdict
As always, the article is really well written. I'm going to put it On hold for now. Just a few small fixes, shouldn't take too long.
LOVI33 15:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
LOVI33 Thanks for the review and proper feedback, have made some comments to you regarding it though. --
K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake, you had good reasons for not applying some of my suggestions so I'm going to ✓Pass it. Great Job!
LOVI33 16:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Ballad?
A review quoted in the article says "Closed on Sunday" is a ballads. May I add the article to the category "2010s ballads?"
MagicatthemovieS (
talk) 21:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)MagicatthemovieSreply
Just for anyone who is not aware of the full context, the review is the only source that says the single is a ballad; I tried searching the internet for others but could not find any more RS that say that, plus this is in the Critical reception section. Thought I'd point out to help awareness, though I appreciate the user being constructive and posting this on the talk page. --
K. Peake 10:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Good article, long enough, well-referenced, no copy-vios detected, hook cited-inline / interesting, no QPQ needed as this is the nominator’s third nomination. Good to go!
Ashleyyoursmile! 06:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)reply