This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Needs a sound sample! -- Taral 05:58, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
From its own description, this is an unrounded mid central vowel. Wouldn't it be better to move the section about it there? FilipeS 20:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I am proposing that the section on the Mid-central unrounded vowel, in the article on the Close-mid central unrounded vowel, be moved to Mid central vowel. From its own description, that sound is a mid vowel, not a close-mid vowel. FilipeS 14:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Other articles on vowels make reference to more than one sound, for example this one. What's wrong with doing the same in the article on the schwa? As a matter of fact, "schwa" already is defined in two different ways. FilipeS 13:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
How come this sound isn't on the Wikipedia:IPA page? 70.23.234.81 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Close-mid central unrounded vowel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.katia-chirkova.info/resources/publications/published/KC2013Lizu.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.katia-chirkova.info/resources/publications/published/KC2013Xumi1.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.katia-chirkova.info/resources/publications/published/KC2013Xumi2.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Relevant discussion at | → Talk:Mid central vowel#Challenging the recent edits by Kbb2, especially concerning German |
-- mach 🙈🙉🙊 17:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
In Special:Diff/776289294, Kbb2 has introduced a highly dubious text, for several reasons:
I think we should delete this passage altogether until we can find a reliable secondary source that explains the phenomenon. At the very least, we should move it to Close central unrounded vowel, which is how the source given describes the vowel. -- mach 🙈🙉🙊 20:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I see no divergence from the source here.The extremely obvious divergence is that the source uses [ɨ], but you have used [ɘ] instead. Do you have any source for backing up this striking divergence? It seems to me it what you are trying to push your personal POV.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Needs a sound sample! -- Taral 05:58, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
From its own description, this is an unrounded mid central vowel. Wouldn't it be better to move the section about it there? FilipeS 20:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I am proposing that the section on the Mid-central unrounded vowel, in the article on the Close-mid central unrounded vowel, be moved to Mid central vowel. From its own description, that sound is a mid vowel, not a close-mid vowel. FilipeS 14:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Other articles on vowels make reference to more than one sound, for example this one. What's wrong with doing the same in the article on the schwa? As a matter of fact, "schwa" already is defined in two different ways. FilipeS 13:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
How come this sound isn't on the Wikipedia:IPA page? 70.23.234.81 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Close-mid central unrounded vowel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.katia-chirkova.info/resources/publications/published/KC2013Lizu.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.katia-chirkova.info/resources/publications/published/KC2013Xumi1.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.katia-chirkova.info/resources/publications/published/KC2013Xumi2.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Relevant discussion at | → Talk:Mid central vowel#Challenging the recent edits by Kbb2, especially concerning German |
-- mach 🙈🙉🙊 17:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
In Special:Diff/776289294, Kbb2 has introduced a highly dubious text, for several reasons:
I think we should delete this passage altogether until we can find a reliable secondary source that explains the phenomenon. At the very least, we should move it to Close central unrounded vowel, which is how the source given describes the vowel. -- mach 🙈🙉🙊 20:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I see no divergence from the source here.The extremely obvious divergence is that the source uses [ɨ], but you have used [ɘ] instead. Do you have any source for backing up this striking divergence? It seems to me it what you are trying to push your personal POV.