This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Clinton Cash article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Presently, the 3rd party reporting about the book, and the author's own comments during his publicity tour, are the only available information about what's actually inside the book. I created a "Publication" section for this type of material. The Times/WaPo/Fox "exclusive agreement" material should take a back seat to the material that is in the book, once it's available. Perhaps there should be a section about the book's impact on the political debate, but that seems premature at this point. Trumpetrep ( talk) 16:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
( talk — Preceding undated comment added 20:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
This article needs additional citations for
verification. |
This section needs additional citations for
verification. |
I still think this article may need to be reverted to a previous version. It just doesn't read well at this time. Anyone else have thoughts? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The quote here "BuzzFeed was able to disprove Schweizer's claim that Bill Clinton was paid for speeches by Denis O'Brien, the owner of the telecommunications firm Digicel. Schweizer asserts that shortly after these paid speeches, Digicel was awarded $2 million in USAID contracts. However, Clinton was never paid for the speeches in question." Doesn't seem to be in the source cited. It seems to quote clinton spokesmen. Also, if the article is cited, so should Schweizer's response found in same article. Costatitanica ( talk) 18:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Good work. Trumpetrep ( talk) 22:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Howdy, y'all. Stumbled upon this page and found it pretty jumbled and confusing, so I just gave it a quick and blunt first round of edits. Planning to do more research and add more sources and expand the article, but just wanted to say I'm open to feedback and I hope to collaborate with any other interested editors. Thanks! Safehaven86 ( talk) 22:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
The article currently states the file is to premiere in the US at the DNC next week. There is a screening planned in Cleveland on 7/19/2016 in conjunction with the RNC. See article below:
76.189.68.39 ( talk) 20:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Gary
Greetings! SUPER new to the editing thing. I was wondering about the section under Reception concerning 'Schweizer's assertion that Clinton, as Secretary of State, could have stopped Russia from buying a company with extensive uranium mining operations in the U.S. to be false'. Upon reading the cite, the author actually makes this statement in an interview with Fox news and not in the book. Since this article is about the book, should this sentence be clarified somewhat? Or am I splitting hairs? Kagaseya ( talk) 23:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagaseya ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, USan Wikipedians! Apart from my small administrative edit, I will not touch this article. However, as this film has been translated into Polish and is promoted by the well-known Polish weekly Wprost, please list the allegations. I found this: http://investmentwatchblog.com/clinton-cash-everything-is-for-sale/ which lists much higher speaking fees of Mr Clinton, btw:
...resulting in over $2mm in speaking fees.
Zezen ( talk) 02:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clinton Cash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I've removed the sentence about Schweizer's misstatement, which: was in a single interview and not in the book; he promptly corrected with an explanation; and actually contradicted correct information in the book. It's extremely confusing to include it here, not to mention irrelevant to the subject of the book (and actual errors within). Please see Talk:Peter Schweizer#Error regarding corrections to "Clinton Cash" for a lengthy discussion. Thanks! ElleTheBelle 22:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Clinton Cash article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Presently, the 3rd party reporting about the book, and the author's own comments during his publicity tour, are the only available information about what's actually inside the book. I created a "Publication" section for this type of material. The Times/WaPo/Fox "exclusive agreement" material should take a back seat to the material that is in the book, once it's available. Perhaps there should be a section about the book's impact on the political debate, but that seems premature at this point. Trumpetrep ( talk) 16:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
( talk — Preceding undated comment added 20:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
This article needs additional citations for
verification. |
This section needs additional citations for
verification. |
I still think this article may need to be reverted to a previous version. It just doesn't read well at this time. Anyone else have thoughts? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The quote here "BuzzFeed was able to disprove Schweizer's claim that Bill Clinton was paid for speeches by Denis O'Brien, the owner of the telecommunications firm Digicel. Schweizer asserts that shortly after these paid speeches, Digicel was awarded $2 million in USAID contracts. However, Clinton was never paid for the speeches in question." Doesn't seem to be in the source cited. It seems to quote clinton spokesmen. Also, if the article is cited, so should Schweizer's response found in same article. Costatitanica ( talk) 18:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Good work. Trumpetrep ( talk) 22:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Howdy, y'all. Stumbled upon this page and found it pretty jumbled and confusing, so I just gave it a quick and blunt first round of edits. Planning to do more research and add more sources and expand the article, but just wanted to say I'm open to feedback and I hope to collaborate with any other interested editors. Thanks! Safehaven86 ( talk) 22:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
The article currently states the file is to premiere in the US at the DNC next week. There is a screening planned in Cleveland on 7/19/2016 in conjunction with the RNC. See article below:
76.189.68.39 ( talk) 20:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Gary
Greetings! SUPER new to the editing thing. I was wondering about the section under Reception concerning 'Schweizer's assertion that Clinton, as Secretary of State, could have stopped Russia from buying a company with extensive uranium mining operations in the U.S. to be false'. Upon reading the cite, the author actually makes this statement in an interview with Fox news and not in the book. Since this article is about the book, should this sentence be clarified somewhat? Or am I splitting hairs? Kagaseya ( talk) 23:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagaseya ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, USan Wikipedians! Apart from my small administrative edit, I will not touch this article. However, as this film has been translated into Polish and is promoted by the well-known Polish weekly Wprost, please list the allegations. I found this: http://investmentwatchblog.com/clinton-cash-everything-is-for-sale/ which lists much higher speaking fees of Mr Clinton, btw:
...resulting in over $2mm in speaking fees.
Zezen ( talk) 02:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clinton Cash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I've removed the sentence about Schweizer's misstatement, which: was in a single interview and not in the book; he promptly corrected with an explanation; and actually contradicted correct information in the book. It's extremely confusing to include it here, not to mention irrelevant to the subject of the book (and actual errors within). Please see Talk:Peter Schweizer#Error regarding corrections to "Clinton Cash" for a lengthy discussion. Thanks! ElleTheBelle 22:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)