This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Clinical trial article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mgregg21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
I think Munir Pirmohamed, professor of molecular and clinical pharmacology at the University of Liverpool, reported in the Pharmaceutical Journal [1] is an adequate source for this. It's common knowledge that old sick people are rarely included in clinical trials, and a House of Lords Inquiry is a reputable source. Rathfelder ( talk) 19:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
References
Needs a WP:MEDREV review to make such a statement in an encyclopedia about "poisoning older people" because the senior age group was excluded from clinical trial designs, then developed adverse effects when overdosed on the medications studied in younger people. The Pharm J and House of Lords opinion are mainly news and speculation without firm evidence given for the opinion. -- Zefr ( talk) 21:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC) There is no shortage of good evidence about over-prescribing and hospital admission. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi all! I would like to include a section on the outsourcing/globalization of clinical trials. With the globalization of clinical trials, there are ethical implications not included in the article. My user page has more info & some references. Thank you for the feedback! Mgregg21 ( talk) 02:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding undated comment added 02:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Wondering what people think about addition of a section for in silico or virtual studies, or if this should be relegated to a separate new article. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
We have an article on analysis, but it has had little attention and weak content for years. A student (in a project on osmosis) has been trying to edit that article this month, but the content and sourcing are poor. I have proposed a merger with this article as a section. 'Analysis' is a complex subject, requiring full-time statistical teams in clinical trial management, indicating a need for a substantial new section. Should we have a section here or develop a separate article on analysis? Zefr ( talk) 14:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
When a Wikipedia article is large, it is often written in summary style. This template is used after the heading of the summary, to link to the subtopic article that has been summarized., I, therefore, think it reasonable, in terms of Wikipedia's style, to have a section here and develop a separate article on analysis. -- Euphemistically ( talk) 15:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Wondering if there would be support for addition of a section related to regulation of clinical trials, primarily by national health regulatory agencies. Thanks for your thoughts. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Clinical trial article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mgregg21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
I think Munir Pirmohamed, professor of molecular and clinical pharmacology at the University of Liverpool, reported in the Pharmaceutical Journal [1] is an adequate source for this. It's common knowledge that old sick people are rarely included in clinical trials, and a House of Lords Inquiry is a reputable source. Rathfelder ( talk) 19:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
References
Needs a WP:MEDREV review to make such a statement in an encyclopedia about "poisoning older people" because the senior age group was excluded from clinical trial designs, then developed adverse effects when overdosed on the medications studied in younger people. The Pharm J and House of Lords opinion are mainly news and speculation without firm evidence given for the opinion. -- Zefr ( talk) 21:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC) There is no shortage of good evidence about over-prescribing and hospital admission. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi all! I would like to include a section on the outsourcing/globalization of clinical trials. With the globalization of clinical trials, there are ethical implications not included in the article. My user page has more info & some references. Thank you for the feedback! Mgregg21 ( talk) 02:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding undated comment added 02:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Wondering what people think about addition of a section for in silico or virtual studies, or if this should be relegated to a separate new article. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
We have an article on analysis, but it has had little attention and weak content for years. A student (in a project on osmosis) has been trying to edit that article this month, but the content and sourcing are poor. I have proposed a merger with this article as a section. 'Analysis' is a complex subject, requiring full-time statistical teams in clinical trial management, indicating a need for a substantial new section. Should we have a section here or develop a separate article on analysis? Zefr ( talk) 14:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
When a Wikipedia article is large, it is often written in summary style. This template is used after the heading of the summary, to link to the subtopic article that has been summarized., I, therefore, think it reasonable, in terms of Wikipedia's style, to have a section here and develop a separate article on analysis. -- Euphemistically ( talk) 15:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Wondering if there would be support for addition of a section related to regulation of clinical trials, primarily by national health regulatory agencies. Thanks for your thoughts. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)