This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pharmacology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Ethics / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics Contemporary philosophy

- add summaries of recent criticisms and alternatives. - history of

Seems to be a problem with the writing on this page. Incomplete sentences? Garbled translation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.230.35 ( talk) 15:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Yes, the writing is practically incoherent. Also the external links lead to a Facebook page, not the sources indicated. This page needs to be seriously reworked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.247.115 ( talk) 19:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply

When I read the history section I thought part of it was complete gibberish, but looking through the page's history it seems that at some point the section was (machine) translated to Hungarian and back to English again. The article content hasn't been improved since December of last year, so I'll restore that version. -- Six words ( talk) 23:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply