GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Horsesizedduck ( talk · contribs) 00:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Greetings, folks. I just stumbled upon this article, found it interesting and decent, and decided to review it. Let's get the road on the show!
Horsesizedduck (
talk)
00:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
First impressions:
Will resume review in around 10 - 12 hours, hopefully. All are welcome to join. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 01:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Returning to resume the review.
Encountered nominator! Good to see you @ Chidgk1:!! Let's get to work! The article looks pretty good to me.
Small report:
Let's keep it up. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 11:51, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I will now mark the sentences I find problematic with the tag. I'll see about fixing some myself if needed. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 13:32, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Chidgk1: I think it is a good time to regroup here and take stock of what is left to do:
As a result, I believe this article is fit for GA status. If you, or any other editor following the process, would like to suggest more changes, I will give you some time to intervene. If there is no opposition, I will then pass the article.
I await reply, and thank you for your work and dedication. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 17:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Putting the article on hold. Will likely pass in 2-3 days, as ongoing work finishes; 7 days feels unnecessary. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 19:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Horsesizedduck ( talk · contribs) 00:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Greetings, folks. I just stumbled upon this article, found it interesting and decent, and decided to review it. Let's get the road on the show!
Horsesizedduck (
talk)
00:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
First impressions:
Will resume review in around 10 - 12 hours, hopefully. All are welcome to join. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 01:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Returning to resume the review.
Encountered nominator! Good to see you @ Chidgk1:!! Let's get to work! The article looks pretty good to me.
Small report:
Let's keep it up. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 11:51, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I will now mark the sentences I find problematic with the tag. I'll see about fixing some myself if needed. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 13:32, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Chidgk1: I think it is a good time to regroup here and take stock of what is left to do:
As a result, I believe this article is fit for GA status. If you, or any other editor following the process, would like to suggest more changes, I will give you some time to intervene. If there is no opposition, I will then pass the article.
I await reply, and thank you for your work and dedication. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 17:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Putting the article on hold. Will likely pass in 2-3 days, as ongoing work finishes; 7 days feels unnecessary. Horsesizedduck ( talk) 19:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)