![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Impactos do aquecimento global no Brasil from pt.wikipedia. |
![]() | A fact from Climate change in Brazil appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 February 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
I created this by using the Content Translation tool on pt:Impactos do aquecimento global no Brasil with a lot of deletion and tweaks. I cannot speak Portuguese but I suspect a lot of the Portuguese article may be out of date. If you can speak Portuguese it would be great if you could update this draft with more recent citations and information. Don't worry about your English as I can easily copyedit if you need. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Following text moved from article as the cites need moving to the right places:
![]() | This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: The cites need to be moved next to the things they are actually citing. Please help improve this section if you can. |
National science data is confirmed by multiple foreign studies, and according to the latest report by the highest authority on the subject, the IPCC, in Brazil there is a consistent rise in temperatures, particularly in the southeast. Other effects observed are the displacement of the monsoon and rain becoming less regular. The prediction is that most regions of the country will become drier, and a few areas are expected to become more humid. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
In recent years, the situation in the Amazon has attracted most attention. The region's vast tropical rainforest has suffered intense degradation, having remained largely intact until the 1970s. Deforestation means massive loss of biodiversity and environmental services, and the suppression of biomass generates large amounts of greenhouse gases, contributing to increase the greenhouse effect and worsen the overall picture of the world. [3] [2] [4] [5] [8]
There is still a considerable degree of uncertainty about the precise way in which changes in rainfall will manifest locally; the theoretical models that make the projections use different variables in their calculations, trying to cover a wide range of plausible trends, but there is a consensus that important changes with large-scale negative consequences will happen if the warming exceeds 2 ° C. Several consequences, in fact, are already being felt and causing significant damage. Therefore, it is easy to predict that an even more disturbed rainfall regime, with excess water in some regions and scarcity in others, will have an important impact not only on wildlife, but also on food and electricity production, which will trigger a series of other indirect effects on security, health, culture and other sectors, disrupting social peace and undermining the prospects for future growth. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
Ruralists and agribusiness representatives defend the free market and a project of unrestricted economic growth. The captains of the rural sector form a large bench in the National Congress and have won a series of influential positions in public administration, including the presidency, ministries, governorships and city halls. Using denialist arguments, these agents have promoted a major setback in environmental policies and programs at all levels, which since the Dilma administration have been suffering severe upheavals. They have also promoted profound legislative reforms to the detriment of the environment and favorable to agribusiness. [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23]
References
I moved the following sentence from the article to here:
But even so, the national picture shows signs of worsening in many sectors, [1] [2] and Dilma Rousseff's government was severely criticized for developing an ambiguous, unlawful and backward social policy in many other respects, with losses not compensated by gains, complicated by bureaucracy, corruption and administrative incompetence, conflicting sectoral policies, contradictory legislation, and an emphasis on megaprojects that drain vast public resources but have dubious efficiency. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
because I am unable to allocate the cites to each individual point. Because the criticism is so serious I think that each point needs to be cited individually as affecting deforestation or agriculture (as they are main causes of climate change in the country). If you know Portuguese perhaps you can put the cites in the right places and put the sentence back in the article if it deserves to be there. Chidgk1 ( talk) 06:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
References
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
18:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Created by Chidgk1 ( talk). Self-nominated at 07:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC).
Thanks for setting up this article in English, User:Chidgk1 ! My suggestion would be to change the headings and structure of this article to be in line with the template that has been proposed here for all articles of the nature "Climate change in Country X": /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Climate_change/Style_guide (see also discussion on that page's talk page). Anyone has any objections? @ User:PlanetCare, @ User:Chipmunkdavis. EMsmile ( talk) 02:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
This article is getting a bit out of date. It would be great if more recent information from 2022 and 2023 could be included. 62.46.207.145 ( talk) 06:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Impactos do aquecimento global no Brasil from pt.wikipedia. |
![]() | A fact from Climate change in Brazil appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 February 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
I created this by using the Content Translation tool on pt:Impactos do aquecimento global no Brasil with a lot of deletion and tweaks. I cannot speak Portuguese but I suspect a lot of the Portuguese article may be out of date. If you can speak Portuguese it would be great if you could update this draft with more recent citations and information. Don't worry about your English as I can easily copyedit if you need. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Following text moved from article as the cites need moving to the right places:
![]() | This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: The cites need to be moved next to the things they are actually citing. Please help improve this section if you can. |
National science data is confirmed by multiple foreign studies, and according to the latest report by the highest authority on the subject, the IPCC, in Brazil there is a consistent rise in temperatures, particularly in the southeast. Other effects observed are the displacement of the monsoon and rain becoming less regular. The prediction is that most regions of the country will become drier, and a few areas are expected to become more humid. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
In recent years, the situation in the Amazon has attracted most attention. The region's vast tropical rainforest has suffered intense degradation, having remained largely intact until the 1970s. Deforestation means massive loss of biodiversity and environmental services, and the suppression of biomass generates large amounts of greenhouse gases, contributing to increase the greenhouse effect and worsen the overall picture of the world. [3] [2] [4] [5] [8]
There is still a considerable degree of uncertainty about the precise way in which changes in rainfall will manifest locally; the theoretical models that make the projections use different variables in their calculations, trying to cover a wide range of plausible trends, but there is a consensus that important changes with large-scale negative consequences will happen if the warming exceeds 2 ° C. Several consequences, in fact, are already being felt and causing significant damage. Therefore, it is easy to predict that an even more disturbed rainfall regime, with excess water in some regions and scarcity in others, will have an important impact not only on wildlife, but also on food and electricity production, which will trigger a series of other indirect effects on security, health, culture and other sectors, disrupting social peace and undermining the prospects for future growth. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
Ruralists and agribusiness representatives defend the free market and a project of unrestricted economic growth. The captains of the rural sector form a large bench in the National Congress and have won a series of influential positions in public administration, including the presidency, ministries, governorships and city halls. Using denialist arguments, these agents have promoted a major setback in environmental policies and programs at all levels, which since the Dilma administration have been suffering severe upheavals. They have also promoted profound legislative reforms to the detriment of the environment and favorable to agribusiness. [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23]
References
I moved the following sentence from the article to here:
But even so, the national picture shows signs of worsening in many sectors, [1] [2] and Dilma Rousseff's government was severely criticized for developing an ambiguous, unlawful and backward social policy in many other respects, with losses not compensated by gains, complicated by bureaucracy, corruption and administrative incompetence, conflicting sectoral policies, contradictory legislation, and an emphasis on megaprojects that drain vast public resources but have dubious efficiency. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
because I am unable to allocate the cites to each individual point. Because the criticism is so serious I think that each point needs to be cited individually as affecting deforestation or agriculture (as they are main causes of climate change in the country). If you know Portuguese perhaps you can put the cites in the right places and put the sentence back in the article if it deserves to be there. Chidgk1 ( talk) 06:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
References
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
18:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Created by Chidgk1 ( talk). Self-nominated at 07:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC).
Thanks for setting up this article in English, User:Chidgk1 ! My suggestion would be to change the headings and structure of this article to be in line with the template that has been proposed here for all articles of the nature "Climate change in Country X": /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Climate_change/Style_guide (see also discussion on that page's talk page). Anyone has any objections? @ User:PlanetCare, @ User:Chipmunkdavis. EMsmile ( talk) 02:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
This article is getting a bit out of date. It would be great if more recent information from 2022 and 2023 could be included. 62.46.207.145 ( talk) 06:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)