This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
umm isnt "several pro-war German emigres" ambiguous - they could have been pro-war as Hitler was?
Victuallers (
talk) 17:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I am concerned that I have found very long phrases that are identical to unattributed sources. I think this needs further re-wording of a substantial nature.
Victuallers (
talk) 11:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Victuallers I've been trying my best to fix the close paraphrasing. It's tough since originally the whole article was copied and pasted from another source. It'll take time to fix everything and get the percentage down from 98% to at least 39%.
Mchuedem (
talk) 19:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Victuallers:@
Mchuedem: I've located better sources and we are using them to improve the article. The close paraphrasing had been a long standing problem with this article possibly since its creation that wasn't known until the DYK review process started for the
Clayton Knight article. The upside is that this is a much better article now and will only get better as it continues to be updated. One of the ILL requests I put in for a source is unable to be filled. But I have a few other irons in the fire.
TeriEmbrey (
talk) 19:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Online sources for improving this article:
[1] and
[2]TeriEmbrey (
talk) 19:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Good work you two, but Im wondering how this gets to DYK. Articles have to be new GAs, or articles less than 7 days old when nominated or expanded by a factor of 5 in 7 days. I don't think this article fits in any of those categories. I suggest you remove this one from the DYK nom. Am I right?
Victuallers (
talk) 20:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
umm isnt "several pro-war German emigres" ambiguous - they could have been pro-war as Hitler was?
Victuallers (
talk) 17:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I am concerned that I have found very long phrases that are identical to unattributed sources. I think this needs further re-wording of a substantial nature.
Victuallers (
talk) 11:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Victuallers I've been trying my best to fix the close paraphrasing. It's tough since originally the whole article was copied and pasted from another source. It'll take time to fix everything and get the percentage down from 98% to at least 39%.
Mchuedem (
talk) 19:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Victuallers:@
Mchuedem: I've located better sources and we are using them to improve the article. The close paraphrasing had been a long standing problem with this article possibly since its creation that wasn't known until the DYK review process started for the
Clayton Knight article. The upside is that this is a much better article now and will only get better as it continues to be updated. One of the ILL requests I put in for a source is unable to be filled. But I have a few other irons in the fire.
TeriEmbrey (
talk) 19:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Online sources for improving this article:
[1] and
[2]TeriEmbrey (
talk) 19:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Good work you two, but Im wondering how this gets to DYK. Articles have to be new GAs, or articles less than 7 days old when nominated or expanded by a factor of 5 in 7 days. I don't think this article fits in any of those categories. I suggest you remove this one from the DYK nom. Am I right?
Victuallers (
talk) 20:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply