This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
"|" unexplained
The article has 172 appearances of this character. Here's the first: Zieliński established that a Ciceronian clausula had two parts: a "base", generally a cretic | – u – | or a variation on it, But the cretic article, linked here, does not explain it, and I can't find an explanation elsewhere in the article. Maybe it's familiar to those who are already familiar with prosody, but not everyone is. (I'm not.) So the notation ought to be explained.
Omc (
talk) 19:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
/ˈkɒmətə/
A bit misleading that we're shown the English pronunciation here, not the Latin one, but why show the pronunciation for this particular word anyway?
184.162.250.229 (
talk) 19:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
"|" unexplained
The article has 172 appearances of this character. Here's the first: Zieliński established that a Ciceronian clausula had two parts: a "base", generally a cretic | – u – | or a variation on it, But the cretic article, linked here, does not explain it, and I can't find an explanation elsewhere in the article. Maybe it's familiar to those who are already familiar with prosody, but not everyone is. (I'm not.) So the notation ought to be explained.
Omc (
talk) 19:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
/ˈkɒmətə/
A bit misleading that we're shown the English pronunciation here, not the Latin one, but why show the pronunciation for this particular word anyway?
184.162.250.229 (
talk) 19:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)reply
