This article was nominated for deletion on August 7, 2007. The result of the discussion was Speedy Close. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The main source for something like this is their own web site, which is totally OK by me. yamaplos 15:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Adding a db-spam tag by an unregistered user is rather inappropriate. The article might be rewritten, but it should be clear that this program warrants an article. If you have clear arguments for deletion, please post them on the talk page or propose alternative actions. LHOON 20:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
The article claims that the "thing" is available in 35 languages but there are wery few available in wiki. I suspect overstatment. I suggest adding a db-spam tag. 134.214.60.125 ( talk) 19:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
This is clearly an overstatment, I suggest adding just a deletion tag. 134.214.60.88 ( talk) 18:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Claroline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://claroline.net.type/consortiumWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on August 7, 2007. The result of the discussion was Speedy Close. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The main source for something like this is their own web site, which is totally OK by me. yamaplos 15:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Adding a db-spam tag by an unregistered user is rather inappropriate. The article might be rewritten, but it should be clear that this program warrants an article. If you have clear arguments for deletion, please post them on the talk page or propose alternative actions. LHOON 20:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
The article claims that the "thing" is available in 35 languages but there are wery few available in wiki. I suspect overstatment. I suggest adding a db-spam tag. 134.214.60.125 ( talk) 19:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
This is clearly an overstatment, I suggest adding just a deletion tag. 134.214.60.88 ( talk) 18:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Claroline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://claroline.net.type/consortiumWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)