From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 14:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC) reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

  • Why is this article named "Clarkson railway station, Perth", if the official name is simply "Clarkson Station"? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 11:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply
    • I would love to have the article moved to that title, but it would take quite a bit of effort to come to consensus in a move discussion and I don't have the energy to go through that right now. Consensus would have to form to move all stations in Perth, and that includes century old stations that would have been known as "railway stations" for most of their life, which I know would be a reason for people to oppose. Another issue is that people would oppose due to that naming system going against stations in other Australian cities. Steelkamp ( talk) 13:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • The lede feels very WP:PROSELINEy to be. See The first contract for the project, a $14 million earthworks contract, was awarded to Brierty Contractors in March 2001. In April 2002, Barclay Mowlem and Alstom were awarded a contract worth $17 million to design and build the extension's rail infrastructure. On 13 November 2002, it was announced that a $8.7million contract was awarded to Transfield for the construction of the station., could we not just say the years? We don't need to say it was announced, just the amount. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 11:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

General

Review meta comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 14:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC) reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

  • Why is this article named "Clarkson railway station, Perth", if the official name is simply "Clarkson Station"? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 11:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply
    • I would love to have the article moved to that title, but it would take quite a bit of effort to come to consensus in a move discussion and I don't have the energy to go through that right now. Consensus would have to form to move all stations in Perth, and that includes century old stations that would have been known as "railway stations" for most of their life, which I know would be a reason for people to oppose. Another issue is that people would oppose due to that naming system going against stations in other Australian cities. Steelkamp ( talk) 13:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • The lede feels very WP:PROSELINEy to be. See The first contract for the project, a $14 million earthworks contract, was awarded to Brierty Contractors in March 2001. In April 2002, Barclay Mowlem and Alstom were awarded a contract worth $17 million to design and build the extension's rail infrastructure. On 13 November 2002, it was announced that a $8.7million contract was awarded to Transfield for the construction of the station., could we not just say the years? We don't need to say it was announced, just the amount. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talkcontribs) 11:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

General

Review meta comments


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook