This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article includes content derived from Theopedia.com, which is under Creative Commons by-3.0 license.
I've added this article in order to aid my development of the Biblical literalism article, which itself is currently pretty poor. This article is probably a better description of the Biblical literalist position than that article, and, combined with several others, could probably replace it, although the Biblical literalist article should probably be retained as a summary of the term as a pejorative. NZUlysses ( talk) 11:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm well aware this page is blatantly POV...it's copied straight out of the evangelical theology wiki theopedia.com. However it is relevant on wikipedia as it is one important aspect of evangelical theology and will fit in usefully with existing articles on Christian theology. Help will be appreciated to change this article to fit wikipedia's NPOV requirements! Keep in mind, as you edit, that this describes the doctrine of clarity of scripture. A 'criticisms' section will be relevant but it won't be necessary to discuss, for instance, a whole range of views about exactly how scripture should be understood. NZUlysses ( talk) 23:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
This article quotes from a lot of primary sources and makes comparisons that are original research because the comparisons do not come from any secondary sources. — Chris Capoccia T⁄ C 15:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article includes content derived from Theopedia.com, which is under Creative Commons by-3.0 license.
I've added this article in order to aid my development of the Biblical literalism article, which itself is currently pretty poor. This article is probably a better description of the Biblical literalist position than that article, and, combined with several others, could probably replace it, although the Biblical literalist article should probably be retained as a summary of the term as a pejorative. NZUlysses ( talk) 11:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm well aware this page is blatantly POV...it's copied straight out of the evangelical theology wiki theopedia.com. However it is relevant on wikipedia as it is one important aspect of evangelical theology and will fit in usefully with existing articles on Christian theology. Help will be appreciated to change this article to fit wikipedia's NPOV requirements! Keep in mind, as you edit, that this describes the doctrine of clarity of scripture. A 'criticisms' section will be relevant but it won't be necessary to discuss, for instance, a whole range of views about exactly how scripture should be understood. NZUlysses ( talk) 23:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
This article quotes from a lot of primary sources and makes comparisons that are original research because the comparisons do not come from any secondary sources. — Chris Capoccia T⁄ C 15:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)