![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't we add that the station will also be included on the Northern Line of the underground? TfL's website says it will: [1] -- Maurice45 ( talk) 17:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
It's just that Clapham High Street is right next door to Clapham North on the Northern Line. Maybe there's a plan to improve interchange between the two that I am not aware of but Clapham High Street won't "be included on the Northern Line". 217.43.82.73 ( talk) 01:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
The only item in History is about a different station. There is no who/when about its building. The old map shows it as Clapham Road. By Course there were two Clapham stations, LBSC and the adjoining LCDR which was open 1862-1916.-- SilasW ( talk) 21:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
A great cottage industry is blobbing and splashing around "wrong" and "correct" colours at every mention of a railway service, which pretty though it may make the page (or not) and may give satisfaction to the painters, in no way improves the ease of reading the subsequently disjointed article and conveys no further information since nowhere in each article is the significance of the colours explained (as it should be if they are used and as it should not be if the articles are to be reasonably confined to important details.) At the worst we have articles beginning "The Eastern line is an LU line coloured skybluepink on ....". As with most trivial platform "Layout"s a whole purge might be desirable.-- SilasW ( talk) 10:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
|col={{LOG color}}
instead of |col=FF7518
- the editor gets the idea that a colour is involved (and might also get the idea that LOG = London OverGround), rather than what (to a non-geek) appears to be a random collection of letters and digits. I've worked with RGB hex triplets for years, but I don't assume that everybody else knows what they mean.The article shows a service at this station on the Victoria-Bromley line, but thus service no longer exists. -- Redaktor ( talk) 09:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
This seems to refer to an adjacent closed station on a route which is still in use thus erroneous and proper for removal.-- MBRZ48 ( talk) 23:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clapham High Street railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't we add that the station will also be included on the Northern Line of the underground? TfL's website says it will: [1] -- Maurice45 ( talk) 17:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
It's just that Clapham High Street is right next door to Clapham North on the Northern Line. Maybe there's a plan to improve interchange between the two that I am not aware of but Clapham High Street won't "be included on the Northern Line". 217.43.82.73 ( talk) 01:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
The only item in History is about a different station. There is no who/when about its building. The old map shows it as Clapham Road. By Course there were two Clapham stations, LBSC and the adjoining LCDR which was open 1862-1916.-- SilasW ( talk) 21:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
A great cottage industry is blobbing and splashing around "wrong" and "correct" colours at every mention of a railway service, which pretty though it may make the page (or not) and may give satisfaction to the painters, in no way improves the ease of reading the subsequently disjointed article and conveys no further information since nowhere in each article is the significance of the colours explained (as it should be if they are used and as it should not be if the articles are to be reasonably confined to important details.) At the worst we have articles beginning "The Eastern line is an LU line coloured skybluepink on ....". As with most trivial platform "Layout"s a whole purge might be desirable.-- SilasW ( talk) 10:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
|col={{LOG color}}
instead of |col=FF7518
- the editor gets the idea that a colour is involved (and might also get the idea that LOG = London OverGround), rather than what (to a non-geek) appears to be a random collection of letters and digits. I've worked with RGB hex triplets for years, but I don't assume that everybody else knows what they mean.The article shows a service at this station on the Victoria-Bromley line, but thus service no longer exists. -- Redaktor ( talk) 09:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
This seems to refer to an adjacent closed station on a route which is still in use thus erroneous and proper for removal.-- MBRZ48 ( talk) 23:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clapham High Street railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)