Resolved NPOV Discussion regarding Tigres favoritism in "Notable Clásicos" Section
I feel some pity towards whoever wrote this article biased in favor of Tigres. He does not have anything to do in his life that has to spend his time writing these fairy tale stories. Not even close to reality. I am a native of Monterrey, huge football fan, and I can really tell you this article made me laugh. It is full of and biased language and some things are just made up, didn't happen as stated.
There is no controversy in this game only made up by you, Not the media. Franco is in correct position, Cite a source where it indicates Franco is offside with Picture and Video. Bottom line is that your wrong untill you are able to prove yourself right. Goal Valid, Mty Advances
and still till today no sources here on wikipedia
Okay lets talk About televisa okay, On December 11, 2006 tell me where in any show covered by televisa narrators stated Franco is offside, La Jugada or Accion. During the game Televisa narrators did not say he was offsides, Main narration in that game was Antonio nelli by televisa, so no offside was ever mentioned
okay so none that i have contributed, but yet you are unable to contribute either. yet no cited sources or newspaper articles or video libraries from televisa. And i haven't contributed, huh. ever think about that it doesn't exist.
This article is full of words that should not be used for the case being, such as "hero" and "magical". I know you guys love your teams, but c'mon, they are strikers, not heros. It made me remember Captain Tsubasa (Los SuperCampeones) —Preceding unsigned comment added by RUL3R ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 27 May 2006
This Article is false It has to be changed because CFM did not protest this issue, "Rayados immediately protested a technicality[6] (the registry of one Tigres player was missing a paper), and the game, and two others, had to be re-matched on the league (the other Clásico, #62, ended 0-0)." Another team in a league cannot have any kind of proper access to another club's information. This technicality was revised by FMF and not by Club Futbol Monterrey and there was not a missing paper. The president of Tigres Had Forged a fake signiture. The prior team that player "Osmar Donizete" played for contacted President of FMF "Alberto De La Torre" and confirmed that "Donizete" had never signed and was not suppose to play with Tigres. I do Have Prove of this Subject recorded on video and is documented by Televisa. I also have a Newspaper Source but I will not use This Source, because Newspaper companies are a unreliable source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.89.128.65 ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 26 April 2006
This Article is completely one-sided and filled with false information on how to favor UANL. Could somebody who actually lives the passion from these games and lives in Monterrey, Mx reword this and be fair.. I believe the editor is a UANL fan and does not mean to make these mistakes but at least get two editors for each side to come to a conclusion that would make this article correct. "Tigres plays better soccer if they win" But rayados " win due to Defensive Tigres Mistakes" so in other words Rayados never wins because they play better only because of Tigres mistakes???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.90.179.184 ( talk • contribs) 00:34, 25 April 2006
This article seems to me to be very much biased towards one team or the other rather than taking a NPOV, particularly in the Noted Clásicos section. Phrases such as "This time, Rayados barely made it through the final with help from the referee", "but Mexican rules and a poor refereeing favored Rayados this time", "The last game in which Tigres saw that remote possibility", etc. Any thoughts? Starfighter Pilot 11:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I have re-added the NPOV tag to the beginning of this article, because the partisans are back at it. 207.248.42.45, who is a frequent contributor to this article and undoubtedly a Tigres fan, has re-added language such as "Crybabies Reyados" and "Tigres played magically" (Which I have removed). Kevyn 15:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely TV is more reliable. In Television Including Documentaries they get the hard facts with all the evidence. I don't believe that my comment is Pro for MTY just putting the facts into this article for you to take consideration. I have been watching this games for more then 15 years, and know every glorious moment of both these teams and their tragedies. From the first years Of CFM foundation in the 40's and UANL old Jabato's name and being owned by government. Also From the old days when Both teams use to play in the same stadium and held a much larger capacity of 70,000. Everything from the 78' 82 Championships of UANL and CFM 86' 03' Championships to defeats in the final. I don't think there is one moment that i don't know from both these teams. From reading all three articles Tigres, MTY, and Clasico Regiomontano I don't believe that i have heard anything Pro for MTY. Now we know that if things are written in favor for both teams MTY will have the better of it. I'm a supporter for both teams and i have found some innacurate information regarding UANL and MTY that is why i ask that we have one person from each team. but i just find it hard to believe that anybody here can have the same knowledge as i would. My friends and I, who some of them have about 35 to 50 years of expierence from these games have discussions about these two teams half and half supporting their team. and we always come down to a conclusion. If one of them disagree's with something I put on my video collection and evidence and finally convince each other how things are. My point is that it would be perfect if it could be done here but quite hard on the Internet. I also believe that all the people that have posted here lean toward the exact same thing. Thank you for your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.97.81 ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 30 April 2006
1.
Clasico 80 on January 15, 2006 is important for being the first one played outside, the score is relevant, that was in extra time is relevant, Tigres being the first team to go to times to Copa Libertadores, relevant, even though it has nothing to do with the Clasicos.
This is completely out out of context:
"Tigres started the match on the attack and had 3 missed chances on the first 5 minutes. In the 5th minute, Rayados midfielder Ricardo "Pepito" Martinez scored a great goal from way outfield, and the team dedicated the rest of the game to defend. Tigres, then overcame the goal and showed more attacking power and better football, which helped them tie the game, send it to extra-time, and claim the championship and ticket to the Libertadores."
Calling this a Championship?
Did some editing,
2.
If Tigres Clasico 75 on August 21, 2004. is relevant because of the goal difference is good, but you have to include both Clasico 3, August 23, 1975 and Clasico 53, July 19, 1997. Both 4-0 in favor of Rayados. Same Goal Difference.
How is a European International league competition relevent to Rayados Vs Tigres Semifinal???
Hari seldon you are the most ignorant lying editor on this topic. Your stories are false and just full of ignorance, cite the source and then post, don't just talk from what you believe happened. Everybody here has told you the same exact thing as how some of your posting are unrelevant. You only post want you want to believe, not on the truth, In other words you talk out your ass, Not the Facts. European international soccer rules are standard? What is Standard? What does A International Soccer game have to do with your own National league? Do some research before you make yourself sound even more ignorant. You still have not been able to cite the So called Controversial Referreeing, Or The So Called Offside, Or the superiority of their rival?
Hari that photo has no proof of anything all it shows is two players and the assistant at the end. There is no assistant holding up his flag quit inventing stories. And that is not a source that is a thread. What does a International Competition have to do with a National League competition??? There is not a National competition with the same rules as a International Competition. Most of the league around the world are not obligated to those rules of away goal, In case you did not know the way for a team to become champion they have to obtain the most points by the end of the Tournament. Mexico is probaly the only country that has PLAYOFFS. Every time your comments become more and more irrational. Understand this away goal rules are only IN INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIONS. Rayados vs Tigres is not International. Therefor there is nothing relevant to this game. Don't say we can also contribute because you erase everything that is true and post your made up comments. Quit lying to the people of wikipedia.
My Deletes are vandalism? HA I laugh at your lies. I don't need aids just normal people to dispute your ignorant, false comments. Vandalism, yes vandalism is the way you have repeatedly broken the rules of wikipedia of NPOV. You lie all the time, I don't even have to tell you that. I live in Monterrey, People know the truth, they disagree with your false comments as so does the city. So im comfortable in my position. Yet you go everyday with that big doubt in your mind. Your knowledge in Sports is minimal, favortism, and false. Yet you have not been able to provide one realiable fact that proves your comments are right, you have put sites that are threads, and photos with no visibility of what you try to proof. The only Vandalism here is your presence and this whole discussion from top to bottom proves me right. The people know, Oh yes i will finally put some real proof to you that is not offside i have a fully visable photo when the player bumps the ball with his head. Hopefully you will finally give it a rest, accept your wrong.
Okay, so if "wikipedia is not about the truth, its what can be double checked". Then Prove that in this topic, prove something that is reasonable. Yes, NPOV is not the ONLY RULE, But the fact is that it is a RULE, Period. Read the guidelines please. you have provided a unvalid photo of players in inside the goal area, and false references that aren't realiable. Yet Again I repeat the only vandalism here are your false comments. You have yet to provide the facts stating that your argument is correct. Discontinue writing false comments and i will refrain from my deletions. Edit the article with a NPOV, not with your beliefs and opinions. And also if reading the guidelines we have the ability to delete or rewrite a article with sources to back it up. The only problem is that you have written the article without citing sources or proving your comments. So in that case there is no vandalism here in my part.
okay i will edit it, and go ahead report me. Lets see for what? I will not stop, I have given you the opportunity to correct the article and you have failed to do so, due to the fact that you are a uanl fan and have a thorn inside of you due to your teams biggest lost in its history. Your threats are desperate. If you like we can talk in chat and discuss this to come to a reasonable conclusion and fair NPOV article.
Okay i have not imposed any kind of point of view NPOV is what i write. Report Me hari seldon you have threatened me for something that i have stated on how to improve the article. I am not required to have a account, My Time is limited. Yet your ignorance is much more of a vandalism to my hipocracy. If it even so does exist. I know the wikipedia rules, Before i am Blocked a Moderator will speak with me. If your able to read the guidelines you will see you have violated rules. You have consistenly tried dictating a topic that is not yours to dictate.
Hola. I've protected the article until the dispute is sorted out here. One important note to the IP editor; please get an account in order to avoid gaming the system by reverting using different IP. If this attitude persists, i'd be obliged to range block them. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 10:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
-- the above unsigned comment was left by Neryaiden on February 28 at 03:17
okay i have offered you the opportunity to improve the article, yet you haven't if you want to debate the issue then lets do so. Yet i contribute nothing you say, but yet when i do, you only overwrite it with your same article, So you haven't contributed anything much, What is done is pretty much the same Delete mine and rewrite with your same copy and paste article. You source material, Yet in your own source material it does not back up the pov brought into topic. Don't you agree that you should remove the Offside? Since you have not provided any source material on that subject. And also the picture that supposely describes the assistant putting up his flag. which is never visable in video nor image. I agree with your first pov of a foul inside the area because your own cited source says it. Yet in your own article you havent listed Erviti's unfair expulsion.
Accusations are not contributions, yeah how conveniant, huh. ?? http://www.doctoramor.com/foro/showthread.php?p=3225756#post3225756 ??? are you kidding me? hari come on, that is not a source doctor amor is a thread for people's ppov. 13th is not a reliable citation. Incredible, Just Unbelievable to use doctor amor as a citation. Still not a valid point of view. Unlock the article so i can provide you with a no excuse, undeniable image proof of the second play. -- the above unsigned comment was left by Neryaiden
okay and yet not documentation of what you state is even there? i say just re edit by saying it was a controversial game with calls effecting both sides in what the article that you provided states, only what the article states. And remove the offside due to no documentation. Excuse me for taking soo long I have a life to attend to also. - The above unsigned comment was left by Neryaiden at 09:21, March 10, 2007
The difference between my posts is that yours are completely ignorant, and mine are fact. You say there "is" documentation but yet where is it? I say no and its deja vu all again, . Regardless of it being a npov or pov, It is what it is. I have proved you wrong on every single topic and never even needed to cite a source to back up something that i post because you know it's true. and yet I am the hypocrite? and filled with stubborness?. And do you speak for the rest of wikipedia, Also on every single topic i have ever posted anything I have never ever had anybody object to me, yet in your own postings you have numerous of people objecting to your pov's. And you have even said it you let your passion take over. So lets unlock this article and come down to a reasonable article. Now I'm going to ask you Do you want to use your Citation article and claim that article to stay. Simple, yes or no question.
Yes, I know you have given documentation, I'm not against that hari, Document it, I have not objected to your source. Yet you have not cited what i asked. yes, let the adequate proposals stay. Yet again your ignorance remains. you have not sourced a cite about the offside, And source 13 is not a "HIGH QUALITY" SOURCE. I believing that your comments are a joke, I sincerely doubt you are in any school, due to your lack of knowledge. Yet again you are unable to prove me wrong or even defend your case. If we were in court or any kind of live debate, you would have been long gone. oh by the way Is It Necessary to cite a source when its true and EVERYBODY agrees? Like i said YES OR NO? -- the above unsigned comment was left by 69.150.49.54 on 04:34, March 17, 2007
Ok, I think we've had enough debate. You, Neraiden, have engaged in personal attacks against me, and in an apparent sockpuppetry. Your lack of knowledge of wikipedia policy, and your claims that you "have a life" lead me to assume that the use of different IPs is simply a misunderstanding and due to unintentional actions on your part. Therefore, I will not call an administrator. However, I do kindly ask you that you listen to reason. As a first step, I present to you a proposal for re-wording. As you notice it is not what you wanted (complete delete of the paragrapgh), but it does makes it clearer that Franco's goal is offside only in point of view. The proposal also takes away many adjectives, because it is believed that this increases objectivity and NPOV. So, without further a do, here is my re-wording proposal:
This proposal takes into consideration the removal of the contested picture. It also removes biased adjectives (such as "heroic", "hero", and "biased decision"). It includes Erviti's red card and labels it as controversial, and it clearly states that the apparent offside is argued only "by some", and is included as an explanation of Gaitán's hitting of the ref near the end.
I believe that this proposal is a great improvement from what the article currently says. What do you think? Hari Seldon 00:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I imagined so. This is why it is useful to have a username. Using different IPs make it look like there are different users advocating for the same thing. Since you did not explicitly used this tactic of deceit, I assumed good faith. However, please get a username, it helps other wikipedians identify the origin of arguments and edits. Since we are in agreement, I will signal an admin tonight so that the article can be updated immediately. I ask you to abide by this agreement we make here today. Finally, the article still needs a lot of work, particularly in the graphical area, but also documenting important players in the Clásicos (for instance, there are very few "notable players" from Rayados history). Perhaps you can help? Hari Seldon 23:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello guys. I've just unprotected the article. I hope consensus would be reached very soon. Please let me know if you need any help. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 12:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Resolved NPOV Discussion regarding Tigres favoritism in "Notable Clásicos" Section
I feel some pity towards whoever wrote this article biased in favor of Tigres. He does not have anything to do in his life that has to spend his time writing these fairy tale stories. Not even close to reality. I am a native of Monterrey, huge football fan, and I can really tell you this article made me laugh. It is full of and biased language and some things are just made up, didn't happen as stated.
There is no controversy in this game only made up by you, Not the media. Franco is in correct position, Cite a source where it indicates Franco is offside with Picture and Video. Bottom line is that your wrong untill you are able to prove yourself right. Goal Valid, Mty Advances
and still till today no sources here on wikipedia
Okay lets talk About televisa okay, On December 11, 2006 tell me where in any show covered by televisa narrators stated Franco is offside, La Jugada or Accion. During the game Televisa narrators did not say he was offsides, Main narration in that game was Antonio nelli by televisa, so no offside was ever mentioned
okay so none that i have contributed, but yet you are unable to contribute either. yet no cited sources or newspaper articles or video libraries from televisa. And i haven't contributed, huh. ever think about that it doesn't exist.
This article is full of words that should not be used for the case being, such as "hero" and "magical". I know you guys love your teams, but c'mon, they are strikers, not heros. It made me remember Captain Tsubasa (Los SuperCampeones) —Preceding unsigned comment added by RUL3R ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 27 May 2006
This Article is false It has to be changed because CFM did not protest this issue, "Rayados immediately protested a technicality[6] (the registry of one Tigres player was missing a paper), and the game, and two others, had to be re-matched on the league (the other Clásico, #62, ended 0-0)." Another team in a league cannot have any kind of proper access to another club's information. This technicality was revised by FMF and not by Club Futbol Monterrey and there was not a missing paper. The president of Tigres Had Forged a fake signiture. The prior team that player "Osmar Donizete" played for contacted President of FMF "Alberto De La Torre" and confirmed that "Donizete" had never signed and was not suppose to play with Tigres. I do Have Prove of this Subject recorded on video and is documented by Televisa. I also have a Newspaper Source but I will not use This Source, because Newspaper companies are a unreliable source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.89.128.65 ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 26 April 2006
This Article is completely one-sided and filled with false information on how to favor UANL. Could somebody who actually lives the passion from these games and lives in Monterrey, Mx reword this and be fair.. I believe the editor is a UANL fan and does not mean to make these mistakes but at least get two editors for each side to come to a conclusion that would make this article correct. "Tigres plays better soccer if they win" But rayados " win due to Defensive Tigres Mistakes" so in other words Rayados never wins because they play better only because of Tigres mistakes???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.90.179.184 ( talk • contribs) 00:34, 25 April 2006
This article seems to me to be very much biased towards one team or the other rather than taking a NPOV, particularly in the Noted Clásicos section. Phrases such as "This time, Rayados barely made it through the final with help from the referee", "but Mexican rules and a poor refereeing favored Rayados this time", "The last game in which Tigres saw that remote possibility", etc. Any thoughts? Starfighter Pilot 11:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I have re-added the NPOV tag to the beginning of this article, because the partisans are back at it. 207.248.42.45, who is a frequent contributor to this article and undoubtedly a Tigres fan, has re-added language such as "Crybabies Reyados" and "Tigres played magically" (Which I have removed). Kevyn 15:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely TV is more reliable. In Television Including Documentaries they get the hard facts with all the evidence. I don't believe that my comment is Pro for MTY just putting the facts into this article for you to take consideration. I have been watching this games for more then 15 years, and know every glorious moment of both these teams and their tragedies. From the first years Of CFM foundation in the 40's and UANL old Jabato's name and being owned by government. Also From the old days when Both teams use to play in the same stadium and held a much larger capacity of 70,000. Everything from the 78' 82 Championships of UANL and CFM 86' 03' Championships to defeats in the final. I don't think there is one moment that i don't know from both these teams. From reading all three articles Tigres, MTY, and Clasico Regiomontano I don't believe that i have heard anything Pro for MTY. Now we know that if things are written in favor for both teams MTY will have the better of it. I'm a supporter for both teams and i have found some innacurate information regarding UANL and MTY that is why i ask that we have one person from each team. but i just find it hard to believe that anybody here can have the same knowledge as i would. My friends and I, who some of them have about 35 to 50 years of expierence from these games have discussions about these two teams half and half supporting their team. and we always come down to a conclusion. If one of them disagree's with something I put on my video collection and evidence and finally convince each other how things are. My point is that it would be perfect if it could be done here but quite hard on the Internet. I also believe that all the people that have posted here lean toward the exact same thing. Thank you for your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.97.81 ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 30 April 2006
1.
Clasico 80 on January 15, 2006 is important for being the first one played outside, the score is relevant, that was in extra time is relevant, Tigres being the first team to go to times to Copa Libertadores, relevant, even though it has nothing to do with the Clasicos.
This is completely out out of context:
"Tigres started the match on the attack and had 3 missed chances on the first 5 minutes. In the 5th minute, Rayados midfielder Ricardo "Pepito" Martinez scored a great goal from way outfield, and the team dedicated the rest of the game to defend. Tigres, then overcame the goal and showed more attacking power and better football, which helped them tie the game, send it to extra-time, and claim the championship and ticket to the Libertadores."
Calling this a Championship?
Did some editing,
2.
If Tigres Clasico 75 on August 21, 2004. is relevant because of the goal difference is good, but you have to include both Clasico 3, August 23, 1975 and Clasico 53, July 19, 1997. Both 4-0 in favor of Rayados. Same Goal Difference.
How is a European International league competition relevent to Rayados Vs Tigres Semifinal???
Hari seldon you are the most ignorant lying editor on this topic. Your stories are false and just full of ignorance, cite the source and then post, don't just talk from what you believe happened. Everybody here has told you the same exact thing as how some of your posting are unrelevant. You only post want you want to believe, not on the truth, In other words you talk out your ass, Not the Facts. European international soccer rules are standard? What is Standard? What does A International Soccer game have to do with your own National league? Do some research before you make yourself sound even more ignorant. You still have not been able to cite the So called Controversial Referreeing, Or The So Called Offside, Or the superiority of their rival?
Hari that photo has no proof of anything all it shows is two players and the assistant at the end. There is no assistant holding up his flag quit inventing stories. And that is not a source that is a thread. What does a International Competition have to do with a National League competition??? There is not a National competition with the same rules as a International Competition. Most of the league around the world are not obligated to those rules of away goal, In case you did not know the way for a team to become champion they have to obtain the most points by the end of the Tournament. Mexico is probaly the only country that has PLAYOFFS. Every time your comments become more and more irrational. Understand this away goal rules are only IN INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIONS. Rayados vs Tigres is not International. Therefor there is nothing relevant to this game. Don't say we can also contribute because you erase everything that is true and post your made up comments. Quit lying to the people of wikipedia.
My Deletes are vandalism? HA I laugh at your lies. I don't need aids just normal people to dispute your ignorant, false comments. Vandalism, yes vandalism is the way you have repeatedly broken the rules of wikipedia of NPOV. You lie all the time, I don't even have to tell you that. I live in Monterrey, People know the truth, they disagree with your false comments as so does the city. So im comfortable in my position. Yet you go everyday with that big doubt in your mind. Your knowledge in Sports is minimal, favortism, and false. Yet you have not been able to provide one realiable fact that proves your comments are right, you have put sites that are threads, and photos with no visibility of what you try to proof. The only Vandalism here is your presence and this whole discussion from top to bottom proves me right. The people know, Oh yes i will finally put some real proof to you that is not offside i have a fully visable photo when the player bumps the ball with his head. Hopefully you will finally give it a rest, accept your wrong.
Okay, so if "wikipedia is not about the truth, its what can be double checked". Then Prove that in this topic, prove something that is reasonable. Yes, NPOV is not the ONLY RULE, But the fact is that it is a RULE, Period. Read the guidelines please. you have provided a unvalid photo of players in inside the goal area, and false references that aren't realiable. Yet Again I repeat the only vandalism here are your false comments. You have yet to provide the facts stating that your argument is correct. Discontinue writing false comments and i will refrain from my deletions. Edit the article with a NPOV, not with your beliefs and opinions. And also if reading the guidelines we have the ability to delete or rewrite a article with sources to back it up. The only problem is that you have written the article without citing sources or proving your comments. So in that case there is no vandalism here in my part.
okay i will edit it, and go ahead report me. Lets see for what? I will not stop, I have given you the opportunity to correct the article and you have failed to do so, due to the fact that you are a uanl fan and have a thorn inside of you due to your teams biggest lost in its history. Your threats are desperate. If you like we can talk in chat and discuss this to come to a reasonable conclusion and fair NPOV article.
Okay i have not imposed any kind of point of view NPOV is what i write. Report Me hari seldon you have threatened me for something that i have stated on how to improve the article. I am not required to have a account, My Time is limited. Yet your ignorance is much more of a vandalism to my hipocracy. If it even so does exist. I know the wikipedia rules, Before i am Blocked a Moderator will speak with me. If your able to read the guidelines you will see you have violated rules. You have consistenly tried dictating a topic that is not yours to dictate.
Hola. I've protected the article until the dispute is sorted out here. One important note to the IP editor; please get an account in order to avoid gaming the system by reverting using different IP. If this attitude persists, i'd be obliged to range block them. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 10:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
-- the above unsigned comment was left by Neryaiden on February 28 at 03:17
okay i have offered you the opportunity to improve the article, yet you haven't if you want to debate the issue then lets do so. Yet i contribute nothing you say, but yet when i do, you only overwrite it with your same article, So you haven't contributed anything much, What is done is pretty much the same Delete mine and rewrite with your same copy and paste article. You source material, Yet in your own source material it does not back up the pov brought into topic. Don't you agree that you should remove the Offside? Since you have not provided any source material on that subject. And also the picture that supposely describes the assistant putting up his flag. which is never visable in video nor image. I agree with your first pov of a foul inside the area because your own cited source says it. Yet in your own article you havent listed Erviti's unfair expulsion.
Accusations are not contributions, yeah how conveniant, huh. ?? http://www.doctoramor.com/foro/showthread.php?p=3225756#post3225756 ??? are you kidding me? hari come on, that is not a source doctor amor is a thread for people's ppov. 13th is not a reliable citation. Incredible, Just Unbelievable to use doctor amor as a citation. Still not a valid point of view. Unlock the article so i can provide you with a no excuse, undeniable image proof of the second play. -- the above unsigned comment was left by Neryaiden
okay and yet not documentation of what you state is even there? i say just re edit by saying it was a controversial game with calls effecting both sides in what the article that you provided states, only what the article states. And remove the offside due to no documentation. Excuse me for taking soo long I have a life to attend to also. - The above unsigned comment was left by Neryaiden at 09:21, March 10, 2007
The difference between my posts is that yours are completely ignorant, and mine are fact. You say there "is" documentation but yet where is it? I say no and its deja vu all again, . Regardless of it being a npov or pov, It is what it is. I have proved you wrong on every single topic and never even needed to cite a source to back up something that i post because you know it's true. and yet I am the hypocrite? and filled with stubborness?. And do you speak for the rest of wikipedia, Also on every single topic i have ever posted anything I have never ever had anybody object to me, yet in your own postings you have numerous of people objecting to your pov's. And you have even said it you let your passion take over. So lets unlock this article and come down to a reasonable article. Now I'm going to ask you Do you want to use your Citation article and claim that article to stay. Simple, yes or no question.
Yes, I know you have given documentation, I'm not against that hari, Document it, I have not objected to your source. Yet you have not cited what i asked. yes, let the adequate proposals stay. Yet again your ignorance remains. you have not sourced a cite about the offside, And source 13 is not a "HIGH QUALITY" SOURCE. I believing that your comments are a joke, I sincerely doubt you are in any school, due to your lack of knowledge. Yet again you are unable to prove me wrong or even defend your case. If we were in court or any kind of live debate, you would have been long gone. oh by the way Is It Necessary to cite a source when its true and EVERYBODY agrees? Like i said YES OR NO? -- the above unsigned comment was left by 69.150.49.54 on 04:34, March 17, 2007
Ok, I think we've had enough debate. You, Neraiden, have engaged in personal attacks against me, and in an apparent sockpuppetry. Your lack of knowledge of wikipedia policy, and your claims that you "have a life" lead me to assume that the use of different IPs is simply a misunderstanding and due to unintentional actions on your part. Therefore, I will not call an administrator. However, I do kindly ask you that you listen to reason. As a first step, I present to you a proposal for re-wording. As you notice it is not what you wanted (complete delete of the paragrapgh), but it does makes it clearer that Franco's goal is offside only in point of view. The proposal also takes away many adjectives, because it is believed that this increases objectivity and NPOV. So, without further a do, here is my re-wording proposal:
This proposal takes into consideration the removal of the contested picture. It also removes biased adjectives (such as "heroic", "hero", and "biased decision"). It includes Erviti's red card and labels it as controversial, and it clearly states that the apparent offside is argued only "by some", and is included as an explanation of Gaitán's hitting of the ref near the end.
I believe that this proposal is a great improvement from what the article currently says. What do you think? Hari Seldon 00:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I imagined so. This is why it is useful to have a username. Using different IPs make it look like there are different users advocating for the same thing. Since you did not explicitly used this tactic of deceit, I assumed good faith. However, please get a username, it helps other wikipedians identify the origin of arguments and edits. Since we are in agreement, I will signal an admin tonight so that the article can be updated immediately. I ask you to abide by this agreement we make here today. Finally, the article still needs a lot of work, particularly in the graphical area, but also documenting important players in the Clásicos (for instance, there are very few "notable players" from Rayados history). Perhaps you can help? Hari Seldon 23:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello guys. I've just unprotected the article. I hope consensus would be reached very soon. Please let me know if you need any help. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 12:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)