![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you can't understand the tags added to this article mean, then quite simply, it's comprised of nothing that couldn't be summarised in a simple article on this particular season of the show. WikiuserNI ( talk) 16:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This was not bad faith, I was removing a redundant template. User:WikiuserNI was tag bombing and I removed one of the redundant tags. I have also stuck out the rude bad faith comment above by User:WikiuserNI. It was not sneaky, I simply removed a redundant tag. I was editing the article so it would not need to be merged, and changed the tags. There is nothing wrong with that. The problems with the article changed, so I changed the tags. -- Alpha Quadrant ( talk) 01:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
If this article is undergoing revision, the editors handling it would be well-advised to place an under construction or in use template on it until they're done and the article can be reevaluated. Doniago ( talk) 19:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
In an interview from the Star Trek Magazine here], Sussman states that the aliens in this episode were the same race wiped out by the NOMAD space probe in " The Changeling" from TOS. Miyagawa ( talk) 18:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
This episode is listed in the introduction as Episode 8. However, technically, it is Episode 9. A few of the other episodes in the season make this same error, so I'm going to change them to match the rest of the articles that follow the sequence on the 1 episode page.
Robert Bianco of USA Today highlighted the episode "
What's on TV: Wednesday" (November 14, 2001).
This week on Enterprise (UPN, tonight, 8 ET/PT), those wacky earthlings disguise themselves as locals to investigate a troubled civilization. Let's hope it goes better than their bumbling visit to a Vulcan sanctuary or last week's near-fatal exploration of a comet. Enterprise is one of my favorite new series — but really, the crew needs to start showing signs of competence. Right now, it's like they're doing
McHale's Navy in Space.
It is more a short preview introducing the episode than an actual review. Maybe it could be added to the reception section of last week's episode instead? -- 109.76.142.30 ( talk) 07:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
The template at the top of this page includes "needs picture" request. If anyone ever gets around to it and are considering what image to choose it might be helpful to see the original publicity images. Three images were posted on the StarTrek.com website for this episode, [2] showing the cast in disguise [3] [4] [5] As these images were already used for publicity image and are very low resolution, they might be an easier choice to ensure the WP:NFCC requirements are met. -- 109.79.64.54 ( talk) 04:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you can't understand the tags added to this article mean, then quite simply, it's comprised of nothing that couldn't be summarised in a simple article on this particular season of the show. WikiuserNI ( talk) 16:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This was not bad faith, I was removing a redundant template. User:WikiuserNI was tag bombing and I removed one of the redundant tags. I have also stuck out the rude bad faith comment above by User:WikiuserNI. It was not sneaky, I simply removed a redundant tag. I was editing the article so it would not need to be merged, and changed the tags. There is nothing wrong with that. The problems with the article changed, so I changed the tags. -- Alpha Quadrant ( talk) 01:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
If this article is undergoing revision, the editors handling it would be well-advised to place an under construction or in use template on it until they're done and the article can be reevaluated. Doniago ( talk) 19:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
In an interview from the Star Trek Magazine here], Sussman states that the aliens in this episode were the same race wiped out by the NOMAD space probe in " The Changeling" from TOS. Miyagawa ( talk) 18:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
This episode is listed in the introduction as Episode 8. However, technically, it is Episode 9. A few of the other episodes in the season make this same error, so I'm going to change them to match the rest of the articles that follow the sequence on the 1 episode page.
Robert Bianco of USA Today highlighted the episode "
What's on TV: Wednesday" (November 14, 2001).
This week on Enterprise (UPN, tonight, 8 ET/PT), those wacky earthlings disguise themselves as locals to investigate a troubled civilization. Let's hope it goes better than their bumbling visit to a Vulcan sanctuary or last week's near-fatal exploration of a comet. Enterprise is one of my favorite new series — but really, the crew needs to start showing signs of competence. Right now, it's like they're doing
McHale's Navy in Space.
It is more a short preview introducing the episode than an actual review. Maybe it could be added to the reception section of last week's episode instead? -- 109.76.142.30 ( talk) 07:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
The template at the top of this page includes "needs picture" request. If anyone ever gets around to it and are considering what image to choose it might be helpful to see the original publicity images. Three images were posted on the StarTrek.com website for this episode, [2] showing the cast in disguise [3] [4] [5] As these images were already used for publicity image and are very low resolution, they might be an easier choice to ensure the WP:NFCC requirements are met. -- 109.79.64.54 ( talk) 04:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)