City Girl (song) has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 5, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
City Girl (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from City Girl (song) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 March 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lemonade51 ( talk · contribs) 18:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
This more or less meets the GA criteria IMO, I just have minor quibbles:
No dabs or dead links. References are formatted appropriately and the one image has a sufficient license to go with it. Shall pass once comments have been addressed, on hold till then. Lemonade51 ( talk) 18:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
City Girl (song) has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 5, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
City Girl (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from City Girl (song) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 March 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lemonade51 ( talk · contribs) 18:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
This more or less meets the GA criteria IMO, I just have minor quibbles:
No dabs or dead links. References are formatted appropriately and the one image has a sufficient license to go with it. Shall pass once comments have been addressed, on hold till then. Lemonade51 ( talk) 18:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)