![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs to mention what year the facelift occurred! Ideally in the section about the differences between phase 1 and phase 2. LilRedCasanova 16:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
I think the "Critical appraisal" section is far too long. Does anybody object if I delete it entirely? Biscuittin ( talk) 16:44, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.249.6 ( talk) 15:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
This entire goes on and one, but is poorly constructed around original research and synth. It could really use a entire scrub. 842U ( talk) 09:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Why is it important to specify the American build dates in the infobox for a predominantly European car? Seems simpler to just include the global number. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 16:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The section about DIRAVI seems very out of place here. It's entirely oriented towards explaining a system that has its own separate article and, according to some of the article text under suspension, was only present on a very specific set of the XMs anyway. May I propose its complete removal from this article in favor of an appropriate sentence and wikilink under Design Advances? Corqe ( talk) 19:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs to mention what year the facelift occurred! Ideally in the section about the differences between phase 1 and phase 2. LilRedCasanova 16:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
I think the "Critical appraisal" section is far too long. Does anybody object if I delete it entirely? Biscuittin ( talk) 16:44, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.249.6 ( talk) 15:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
This entire goes on and one, but is poorly constructed around original research and synth. It could really use a entire scrub. 842U ( talk) 09:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Why is it important to specify the American build dates in the infobox for a predominantly European car? Seems simpler to just include the global number. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 16:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The section about DIRAVI seems very out of place here. It's entirely oriented towards explaining a system that has its own separate article and, according to some of the article text under suspension, was only present on a very specific set of the XMs anyway. May I propose its complete removal from this article in favor of an appropriate sentence and wikilink under Design Advances? Corqe ( talk) 19:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)