This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You should take the 'We' stuff out. Otherwise it is simply a cisco marketing slide.this is an encyclopedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.20.221.71 ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
^^ It's an encyclopedia anyone's free to edit, so feel free to do so if you're upset by it. -- Mattsday 01:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
What're peoples thoughts about the 'power supply inefficiencies'? Seems a bit of competitive FUD to me - the documents read more like sales pitches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.103.25.233 ( talk) 18:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Why is the title 'Catalyst 6500' and not 'Cisco Catalyst 6500'. The page for Cisco Catalyst 1900 uses 'Cisco'. There should be consistency. FordneyPachelbel ( talk) 20:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved, as there has been no opposition since the proposed move. It adheres to the common name of the product and better aligns with other Cisco page names. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Catalyst 6500 → Cisco Catalyst 6500 – I've seen both in use for this article subject ( WP:COMMONNAME). Renaming would support WP:CONSISTENT, and renaming could make this a bit less ambiguous. The references in article all say "Cisco Catalyst 6500" in title. For some weight, Network Computing uses both "Cisco Catalyst 6800", "Catalyst 6800" and "Catalyst 6500" in context (usually only saying "Cisco" once). [1] Additionally, the main English Wikipedia article is currently named Cisco Catalyst. 84.250.14.116 ( talk) 09:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC); edited 09:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky ( talk) 10:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
References
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You should take the 'We' stuff out. Otherwise it is simply a cisco marketing slide.this is an encyclopedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.20.221.71 ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
^^ It's an encyclopedia anyone's free to edit, so feel free to do so if you're upset by it. -- Mattsday 01:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
What're peoples thoughts about the 'power supply inefficiencies'? Seems a bit of competitive FUD to me - the documents read more like sales pitches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.103.25.233 ( talk) 18:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Why is the title 'Catalyst 6500' and not 'Cisco Catalyst 6500'. The page for Cisco Catalyst 1900 uses 'Cisco'. There should be consistency. FordneyPachelbel ( talk) 20:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved, as there has been no opposition since the proposed move. It adheres to the common name of the product and better aligns with other Cisco page names. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Catalyst 6500 → Cisco Catalyst 6500 – I've seen both in use for this article subject ( WP:COMMONNAME). Renaming would support WP:CONSISTENT, and renaming could make this a bit less ambiguous. The references in article all say "Cisco Catalyst 6500" in title. For some weight, Network Computing uses both "Cisco Catalyst 6800", "Catalyst 6800" and "Catalyst 6500" in context (usually only saying "Cisco" once). [1] Additionally, the main English Wikipedia article is currently named Cisco Catalyst. 84.250.14.116 ( talk) 09:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC); edited 09:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky ( talk) 10:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
References