This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cisco Catalyst article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved. Consensus was to move and was there for the proposed name. If anyone thinks that Catalyst (switch) is the better choice, free free to renominate to discuss that option. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Catalyst switch →
Cisco Catalyst — These are the Catalyst series switches by Cisco, "switch" is a disambiguatory term. It would be better to call them Cisco Catalyst than use a disambig term outside of parens.
64.229.100.45 (
talk)
08:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I saw the merge-proposal for Cisco Stackwise. Imho Stackwise is just a feature in a line of Catalyst switches and doesn't need its own article; and even if it would: the Q of the original article is not meetig Wiki standards. Therefore did a quick merge ad redird the old link. JanT ( talk) 07:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Just updating version 12.2(33)to SXJ and mentioning the 15.1.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chigibby ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
It would be nice to specify the date of the "to date". Why? It seems that it is up till now, but the today date is advancing everyday, and some of these "to date" may be untrue already. 193.219.179.254 ( talk) 09:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cisco Catalyst article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved. Consensus was to move and was there for the proposed name. If anyone thinks that Catalyst (switch) is the better choice, free free to renominate to discuss that option. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Catalyst switch →
Cisco Catalyst — These are the Catalyst series switches by Cisco, "switch" is a disambiguatory term. It would be better to call them Cisco Catalyst than use a disambig term outside of parens.
64.229.100.45 (
talk)
08:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I saw the merge-proposal for Cisco Stackwise. Imho Stackwise is just a feature in a line of Catalyst switches and doesn't need its own article; and even if it would: the Q of the original article is not meetig Wiki standards. Therefore did a quick merge ad redird the old link. JanT ( talk) 07:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Just updating version 12.2(33)to SXJ and mentioning the 15.1.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chigibby ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
It would be nice to specify the date of the "to date". Why? It seems that it is up till now, but the today date is advancing everyday, and some of these "to date" may be untrue already. 193.219.179.254 ( talk) 09:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)