![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Koeppejk,
Schavez63,
The Sea Boy 18.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 9 May 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Zampaman92.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This is not an article about circuit design at all. However, it is a great compilation of "resistor" and "capacitor"! The info seems to be the same as in the articles resistor and capacitor. I think a new article on circuit design might need to be started.-- RichG 06:35, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
The content on this page should not even be here. It is a very basic overview of electronic components.
Since article seemed to be a copy-and-paste of Resistor and Capacitor I've replaced it with a basic stub and linked it to the articles it was copying. Astaroth5 11:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
The treatment in the main article was to provide something for others to build on. It was only done this way as the previous treatment was in the opinion of most off topic. However if it is going to be flagged as unreferenced, I see no other course than to remove all of my edits. I will not be in violation of the no original research policy.
The article needs a section on documentation. I have been out of the field for too long to know exactly what is expected these days, and while I suspect not much has changed I don't feel comfortable writing about it lest I leave out something critical. DV8 2XL 16:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Im just wondering if this phrase is useful or not. What does it mean? In a random mannner? In a sequential manner. Im not sure. Is anyone else sure? -- Light current 22:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I think it is intended to contrast people designing and building a single system a little at a time ("incrementally") vs. people that design the complete system, then afterwards build it all at once ( WikiWikiWeb:BigDesignUpFront).
For example, a ham radio operator building a TNC can build it incrementally. He can build a power supply and test it out; an audio amp and test it out; then add a RF recieve amp ... ideally, at each step, he has something useful and functioning. The prototyping techniques allow her to add new wires and transistors, or tear out cheap transistors and cable and replace them with better ones.
On the other hand, people manufacturing an IC must do it all at once. Once an IC is fabbed, it's prohibitively expensive to go back and add or replace any more transistors or wires later.
(PCBs are in-between. The PCB itself is fabbed all-at-once. But it's fairly common [1] for minor fixes to be manually added to the PCB -- a bad trace can be cut; a forgotten connection can be added by soldering on wire.)
-- 68.0.120.35 14:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Circuit design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
I need help 5.217.74.0 ( talk) 10:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Koeppejk,
Schavez63,
The Sea Boy 18.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 9 May 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Zampaman92.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This is not an article about circuit design at all. However, it is a great compilation of "resistor" and "capacitor"! The info seems to be the same as in the articles resistor and capacitor. I think a new article on circuit design might need to be started.-- RichG 06:35, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
The content on this page should not even be here. It is a very basic overview of electronic components.
Since article seemed to be a copy-and-paste of Resistor and Capacitor I've replaced it with a basic stub and linked it to the articles it was copying. Astaroth5 11:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
The treatment in the main article was to provide something for others to build on. It was only done this way as the previous treatment was in the opinion of most off topic. However if it is going to be flagged as unreferenced, I see no other course than to remove all of my edits. I will not be in violation of the no original research policy.
The article needs a section on documentation. I have been out of the field for too long to know exactly what is expected these days, and while I suspect not much has changed I don't feel comfortable writing about it lest I leave out something critical. DV8 2XL 16:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Im just wondering if this phrase is useful or not. What does it mean? In a random mannner? In a sequential manner. Im not sure. Is anyone else sure? -- Light current 22:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I think it is intended to contrast people designing and building a single system a little at a time ("incrementally") vs. people that design the complete system, then afterwards build it all at once ( WikiWikiWeb:BigDesignUpFront).
For example, a ham radio operator building a TNC can build it incrementally. He can build a power supply and test it out; an audio amp and test it out; then add a RF recieve amp ... ideally, at each step, he has something useful and functioning. The prototyping techniques allow her to add new wires and transistors, or tear out cheap transistors and cable and replace them with better ones.
On the other hand, people manufacturing an IC must do it all at once. Once an IC is fabbed, it's prohibitively expensive to go back and add or replace any more transistors or wires later.
(PCBs are in-between. The PCB itself is fabbed all-at-once. But it's fairly common [1] for minor fixes to be manually added to the PCB -- a bad trace can be cut; a forgotten connection can be added by soldering on wire.)
-- 68.0.120.35 14:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Circuit design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
I need help 5.217.74.0 ( talk) 10:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)