From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Large or small?

Read in article: A closely related problem is to cover the equilateral triangle with a given number of circles, having as large a radius as possible

Such radius is obvious = . Is it error? May be we have to replace large with small?

Read in article "Conjecturally optimal coverings of an equilateral triangle with up to 36 equal circles":

On the other hand, the dual problem of determining good coverings of an area with n equal circles so that the radius of the circles is as small as possible...

Jumpow ( talk) 18:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC) reply

You are correct, this needs to be changed and I'll do so now. -- Bill Cherowitzo ( talk) 03:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Large or small?

Read in article: A closely related problem is to cover the equilateral triangle with a given number of circles, having as large a radius as possible

Such radius is obvious = . Is it error? May be we have to replace large with small?

Read in article "Conjecturally optimal coverings of an equilateral triangle with up to 36 equal circles":

On the other hand, the dual problem of determining good coverings of an area with n equal circles so that the radius of the circles is as small as possible...

Jumpow ( talk) 18:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC) reply

You are correct, this needs to be changed and I'll do so now. -- Bill Cherowitzo ( talk) 03:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook