This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mills Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Worcestershire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is probably never going to be more than a stub. I am suggesting it be merged with the village of Churchill, Worcestershire, as a feature/landmark of that village. -- Kudpung ( talk) 12:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC) reply

• Oppose It's a valid stub and should remain as an article supported by the Mills WikiProject Mjroots ( talk)
  • Oppose Now it is larger, so I have rated it class=start.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 01:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC) reply

The previous disgraceful article was no more than tourist publicity. The article has been revised to fulfil encyclopaedic standards. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 10:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC) reply