GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 03:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 03:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
I read through this article, and in short, the prose is simply bad. Here are some examples:
In short, the prose is nowhere near GA status. The above is only noting some of the more serious examples. Even a simple copyedit wouldn't be enough; it would need someone to fundamentally rewrite it to be able to get near GA status. Wizardman 03:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 03:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 03:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
I read through this article, and in short, the prose is simply bad. Here are some examples:
In short, the prose is nowhere near GA status. The above is only noting some of the more serious examples. Even a simple copyedit wouldn't be enough; it would need someone to fundamentally rewrite it to be able to get near GA status. Wizardman 03:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)