This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Talk:Chu Pong Massif is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Vietnam This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Mountains Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

I've been really skeptical that this major geographic feature of Vietnam's central highlands — with a storied role in the Vietnam War — has absolutely zero information available about its geology.

I've found this article referring to what seems to be the same feature as the Kon Tum massif: [1].

Will keep on looking and will develop article accordingly. Darouet ( talk) 18:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

OK, wrong there! Kon Tum is NNE. - Darouet ( talk) 18:11, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply