 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The title of this article is incorrect. It should technically be named Imperial Parade Phaeton because as of 1955, there was no such thing as a "Chrysler Imperial" (as a new vehicle), just Imperial, which had become a stand-alone marque.
(As a compromise, it could be called "Chrysler's Imperial Parade Phaeton", although it's a cop-out; no one would say "GM's Cadillac" or "Ford's Lincoln".)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The title of this article is incorrect. It should technically be named Imperial Parade Phaeton because as of 1955, there was no such thing as a "Chrysler Imperial" (as a new vehicle), just Imperial, which had become a stand-alone marque.
(As a compromise, it could be called "Chrysler's Imperial Parade Phaeton", although it's a cop-out; no one would say "GM's Cadillac" or "Ford's Lincoln".)