![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I just came across this interesting article. Should this be added to the article? Bill the Cat 7 ( talk) 19:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Saints Chrysanthus and Daria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Let's say aristocratic young man married away to older woman (up to 7-8 yrs older) is plausible, but those 2 elements (#3 & 4) make the conclusion look very fishy & biased. Arminden ( talk) 13:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I just came across this interesting article. Should this be added to the article? Bill the Cat 7 ( talk) 19:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Saints Chrysanthus and Daria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Let's say aristocratic young man married away to older woman (up to 7-8 yrs older) is plausible, but those 2 elements (#3 & 4) make the conclusion look very fishy & biased. Arminden ( talk) 13:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)