A fact from Chronographer appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
GTG. Great stuff! New (just moved from sandbox), long & neutral enough. Well-written, qpq done. Hook checks out, although (perhaps being pedantic) I prefer to keep "depicted" for pictures - maybe "represented" or "tried to represent" as a tad more accurate. Earwig just finds quotes & titles, pic ok for main page.
Johnbod (
talk)
18:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)reply
A fact from Chronographer appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
GTG. Great stuff! New (just moved from sandbox), long & neutral enough. Well-written, qpq done. Hook checks out, although (perhaps being pedantic) I prefer to keep "depicted" for pictures - maybe "represented" or "tried to represent" as a tad more accurate. Earwig just finds quotes & titles, pic ok for main page.
Johnbod (
talk)
18:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)reply