![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citing 'Extensions of Remarks', GPO, 29 March 1971, p. 8480, within this hundred-page PDF.
This reference seems meaningless. The hon. Roman C Pucinski goes on for what occupies several densely laid-out pages (which I confess I haven't read), and within this, on page 8480, merely cites Castanis as having said this. (It's in the paragraph starting "In the book", in the left-hand column.) Or do I misunderstand?
(Pinging Yiannic2020!) -- Hoary ( talk) 07:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Hoary,
You do not misunderstand, this was a vague reference. I have fixed this up and expanded on the point by citing scholars who have worked on this. Hopefully this is clearer.
Best, Yiannic2020
(Pinging Hoary) -- Yiannic2020 ( talk)
I have also fixed the vagueness of the references.
(Pinging Hoary) -- Yiannic2020 ( talk) 27 April 2021, 2:56 pm (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citing 'Extensions of Remarks', GPO, 29 March 1971, p. 8480, within this hundred-page PDF.
This reference seems meaningless. The hon. Roman C Pucinski goes on for what occupies several densely laid-out pages (which I confess I haven't read), and within this, on page 8480, merely cites Castanis as having said this. (It's in the paragraph starting "In the book", in the left-hand column.) Or do I misunderstand?
(Pinging Yiannic2020!) -- Hoary ( talk) 07:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Hoary,
You do not misunderstand, this was a vague reference. I have fixed this up and expanded on the point by citing scholars who have worked on this. Hopefully this is clearer.
Best, Yiannic2020
(Pinging Hoary) -- Yiannic2020 ( talk)
I have also fixed the vagueness of the references.
(Pinging Hoary) -- Yiannic2020 ( talk) 27 April 2021, 2:56 pm (UTC)