This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In Bishop of Reykjavik (Catholic) there is also a part on the "Christianization of Iceland" - couldn't these two articles be combined or made to one article? Gecko78 19:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
That will do. Thank you. -- VKokielov ( talk) 21:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
I realize the whole article is almost unreferenced (well no inline refs anyway), but in particular the section of text about "the exposure of infants", is unacceptable because as it is it sounds to much like blood libel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.40.127 ( talk) 00:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Akigka reverted all my recent changes saying I added a spam link? But the link is the same one from the main Iceland article. And if he though the link was spam, then just remove the link. For consistency sake, the text I added is the same as the main Iceland article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.19.169.231 ( talk) 16:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Needs to be a nod to the possibility of the papar pre-dating settlement. Snori ( talk)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 20:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Christianization of Iceland → Christianisation of Iceland – WP:CONSISTENCY with - as subtopic of - Christianisation of the Germanic peoples. PPEMES ( talk) 14:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In Bishop of Reykjavik (Catholic) there is also a part on the "Christianization of Iceland" - couldn't these two articles be combined or made to one article? Gecko78 19:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
That will do. Thank you. -- VKokielov ( talk) 21:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
I realize the whole article is almost unreferenced (well no inline refs anyway), but in particular the section of text about "the exposure of infants", is unacceptable because as it is it sounds to much like blood libel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.40.127 ( talk) 00:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Akigka reverted all my recent changes saying I added a spam link? But the link is the same one from the main Iceland article. And if he though the link was spam, then just remove the link. For consistency sake, the text I added is the same as the main Iceland article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.19.169.231 ( talk) 16:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Needs to be a nod to the possibility of the papar pre-dating settlement. Snori ( talk)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 20:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Christianization of Iceland → Christianisation of Iceland – WP:CONSISTENCY with - as subtopic of - Christianisation of the Germanic peoples. PPEMES ( talk) 14:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)