From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

I noticed that Chris Onstad alluded to the possibilty that he studied communications in college. Should this be added? He said it on his blog.

POV/Original Research/Verifiability issues

A lot of this reads like promotional copy. I'm not sure what the running commentary in the article is verifiable or sourcable, as well. -- sigmafactor 02:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Agreed. Influences and biographical information are best.

Removing the main body of the article entirely seems a radical step. Granted, it was problematic, but surely some of it could be saved. john k 17:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

I noticed that Chris Onstad alluded to the possibilty that he studied communications in college. Should this be added? He said it on his blog.

POV/Original Research/Verifiability issues

A lot of this reads like promotional copy. I'm not sure what the running commentary in the article is verifiable or sourcable, as well. -- sigmafactor 02:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Agreed. Influences and biographical information are best.

Removing the main body of the article entirely seems a radical step. Granted, it was problematic, but surely some of it could be saved. john k 17:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook