This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Even if Dykstra did contact her ex months after the allegedly abusive relationship ended, this is no evidence that the relationship was not abusive; I have known women who still loved and wanted to be with their abusive ex months after they finally had the strength to end the relationship. I wish the Hollywood gossip rags would not imply otherwise.
It can be a very difficult emotional process to let go of someone who is abusive.
References:
This in mind, I have removed the alleged text messages from the article.
Samboy ( talk) 17:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Agreed. That whole section is way too long. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18A:100:FC70:B0E8:6BF6:7BCB:1CBF ( talk) 23:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Chris Hardwick’s sobriety date is October 8, 2013. However, there are two recent edits where the exact day is considered "not notable". So, to determine whether it is notable, let’s look at how reliable sources describe his sobriety. And they describe it as "October 8, 2003":
So, in light of these references, I do not think we can make a reasonable case that his sobriety date is "not notable". Samboy ( talk) 10:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Why is a sexual misconduct allegation against Hardwick in the lead? Per WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME this seems to be a violation of our policies. I am highly unsettled that it states: "In June 2018, Hardwick was accused of emotional and sexual abuse by his ex-girlfriend Chloe Dykstra." I am even more unsettled that there was an investigation, that Hardwick resumed his job after the investigation that Dykstra refused to participate in, and that there was no adjudication in a court of law. If any ex-girlfriend of any public figure makes an accusation that is not backed by evidence we can just put that accusation forever in the lead of a BLP? That does not seem to conform with our policies nor with the tenets of due process and presumption of innocence that is central to any free society. TrueQuantum ( talk) 16:37, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
I believe the texts should be added back to the abuse allegations section with an addendum including the critical response by abuse victims. MisfitBlitz ( talk) 07:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Even if Dykstra did contact her ex months after the allegedly abusive relationship ended, this is no evidence that the relationship was not abusive; I have known women who still loved and wanted to be with their abusive ex months after they finally had the strength to end the relationship. I wish the Hollywood gossip rags would not imply otherwise.
It can be a very difficult emotional process to let go of someone who is abusive.
References:
This in mind, I have removed the alleged text messages from the article.
Samboy ( talk) 17:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Agreed. That whole section is way too long. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18A:100:FC70:B0E8:6BF6:7BCB:1CBF ( talk) 23:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Chris Hardwick’s sobriety date is October 8, 2013. However, there are two recent edits where the exact day is considered "not notable". So, to determine whether it is notable, let’s look at how reliable sources describe his sobriety. And they describe it as "October 8, 2003":
So, in light of these references, I do not think we can make a reasonable case that his sobriety date is "not notable". Samboy ( talk) 10:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Why is a sexual misconduct allegation against Hardwick in the lead? Per WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME this seems to be a violation of our policies. I am highly unsettled that it states: "In June 2018, Hardwick was accused of emotional and sexual abuse by his ex-girlfriend Chloe Dykstra." I am even more unsettled that there was an investigation, that Hardwick resumed his job after the investigation that Dykstra refused to participate in, and that there was no adjudication in a court of law. If any ex-girlfriend of any public figure makes an accusation that is not backed by evidence we can just put that accusation forever in the lead of a BLP? That does not seem to conform with our policies nor with the tenets of due process and presumption of innocence that is central to any free society. TrueQuantum ( talk) 16:37, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
I believe the texts should be added back to the abuse allegations section with an addendum including the critical response by abuse victims. MisfitBlitz ( talk) 07:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)