Chongqing model has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 20, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Bo Xilai is the pioneer of the
Chongqing model? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I created this page largely based on material written at Bo Xilai. There is more to do. Notably, the page would benefit from more information on how Bo's predecessors contributed to and initiated some of these policies (particularly economic policies, like the focus on manufacturing for domestic consumption). The biggest task I can foresee is adding information on the aftermath of Bo's removal: the campaign against red culture, the attempts to seek redress by people targeted under the anti-corruption drive, etc. I'll get to this some day, if no one beats me to it. Homunculus ( duihua) 21:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
The Chinese phrase "singing red songs" is changhong. [1]
Bo's "Striking Black" policy is seen by one commentator as a "political ploy designed to cast a negative light on his predecessor and political opponent, Wang Yang, and take advantage of popular resentment against corruption". [2] Now, Mr. Wang is being reevaluated as the "hope among China's leadership". [3]
The more controversial crypto-Maoist campaign of singing red songs concerts is also likely to be stopped.
[4] However, because of the economic redistribution, the Chongqing Model has received grassroots and popular support. At least in this regard, the Chongqing Model will likely be remembered and studied.
[5]
On June 29, 2010, at the World Cities Summit in Singapore, Mayor Huang Qifan, the successor to Bo, signaled that the red polices of Bo were changing when he said "a subsidized public housing project designed to free up more money for people to consume and drive the economy” will continue and will be based on Singapore's Housing Development Board. [6] Furthermore, Huang said, “We are pursuing the Reagan-Thatcher model of the 1980s.” [7]
Yang Fan, [8] who is a conservative-leaning scholar at China University of Political Science and Law and and co-author of the book The Chongqing Model, wrote that he might have to reappraise the "Chongqing way of doing things" and "since a big scandal has hit Chongqing, it is imperative that we take a second look at the Chongqing Model". [9]
Wu Jinglian, a Chinese liberal economist, and Sun Jian, a researcher at the Communist party journal Seeking Truth, warned that vested interest blocs, such as the Gang of Princelings, should not block or unwind current reform. [10]
Zhou Lian, an associate professor of philosophy at Renmin University of China, and Ai Weiwei, an artist in Beijing, have publicly criticized Bo and his Chongqing Model for being wrong and lowering trust. [11] Li Zhuang, a lawyer who was imprisoned as part of the "Striking Black" policy, said that "the Chongqing model is problematic because the city's leaders do not follow the rule of law". [12] According to Andrew J. Nathan, a political scientist at Columbia University, "the risk for China is that this scandal could taint everyone in power and challenge the legitimacy of the regime". Furthermore, he said, “All the worst things you ever imagined are actually true” and “It’s not like nobody knew about this stuff, but now they know that it really is true and it’s as bad as it can possibly be.” [13]
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
Please lets us work together to make a good article with great cites.
Geraldshields11 (
talk)
19:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
This is valuable stuff. I think it's especially worthwhile to note that the model remains popular within pretty large segments of the population (particularly outside the business community and the intelligentsia), and that Bo's downfall and the subsequent unravelling is seen as a kind of victory for the Guangdong model. Are you going to make these edits? I'll take a closer look later (whether here or on the page—up to you).
Homunculus (
duihua)
19:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Gerald, I made some edits to incorporate your additions more into the rest of the section. I did not yet touch the material that begins "On June 29, 2010, at the World Cities Summit in Singapore" and continues through the end of the page. In some cases I think it can be better integrated (for instance, there are two places now where Li Zhuang is mentioned; seems this ought to be kept together in a coherent way), or perhaps the ideas can be made a little more clear. However, I'm having a bit of a hard time seeing the relevance of some of this to the Chongqing model specifically; much of it is about the scandal surrounding Bo Xilai and the implications for the princeling faction. What do you think? When I have more time I'll read through the sources you provided more carefully, and may have more thoughts. Regards, Homunculus ( duihua) 23:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Just curious about this edit [1] which removed mention of the surveillance operations as a component of the anti-crimes/corruption drive. The New York Times article describing this makes it pretty clear that the surveillance operations were part of the da hei campaign. Whether or not this is Bo Xilai's MO in generally isn't really the question, is it? Courting investment and planting trees are also components of Bo's policies that predated his arrival in Chongqing. Anyways, here's the excerpt from the Times:
Explanation would be appreciated. Homunculus ( duihua) 03:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MathewTownsend ( talk · contribs) 20:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
MathewTownsend ( talk) 12:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
Congratulations! MathewTownsend ( talk) 15:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Chongqing model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Chongqing model has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 20, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Bo Xilai is the pioneer of the
Chongqing model? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I created this page largely based on material written at Bo Xilai. There is more to do. Notably, the page would benefit from more information on how Bo's predecessors contributed to and initiated some of these policies (particularly economic policies, like the focus on manufacturing for domestic consumption). The biggest task I can foresee is adding information on the aftermath of Bo's removal: the campaign against red culture, the attempts to seek redress by people targeted under the anti-corruption drive, etc. I'll get to this some day, if no one beats me to it. Homunculus ( duihua) 21:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
The Chinese phrase "singing red songs" is changhong. [1]
Bo's "Striking Black" policy is seen by one commentator as a "political ploy designed to cast a negative light on his predecessor and political opponent, Wang Yang, and take advantage of popular resentment against corruption". [2] Now, Mr. Wang is being reevaluated as the "hope among China's leadership". [3]
The more controversial crypto-Maoist campaign of singing red songs concerts is also likely to be stopped.
[4] However, because of the economic redistribution, the Chongqing Model has received grassroots and popular support. At least in this regard, the Chongqing Model will likely be remembered and studied.
[5]
On June 29, 2010, at the World Cities Summit in Singapore, Mayor Huang Qifan, the successor to Bo, signaled that the red polices of Bo were changing when he said "a subsidized public housing project designed to free up more money for people to consume and drive the economy” will continue and will be based on Singapore's Housing Development Board. [6] Furthermore, Huang said, “We are pursuing the Reagan-Thatcher model of the 1980s.” [7]
Yang Fan, [8] who is a conservative-leaning scholar at China University of Political Science and Law and and co-author of the book The Chongqing Model, wrote that he might have to reappraise the "Chongqing way of doing things" and "since a big scandal has hit Chongqing, it is imperative that we take a second look at the Chongqing Model". [9]
Wu Jinglian, a Chinese liberal economist, and Sun Jian, a researcher at the Communist party journal Seeking Truth, warned that vested interest blocs, such as the Gang of Princelings, should not block or unwind current reform. [10]
Zhou Lian, an associate professor of philosophy at Renmin University of China, and Ai Weiwei, an artist in Beijing, have publicly criticized Bo and his Chongqing Model for being wrong and lowering trust. [11] Li Zhuang, a lawyer who was imprisoned as part of the "Striking Black" policy, said that "the Chongqing model is problematic because the city's leaders do not follow the rule of law". [12] According to Andrew J. Nathan, a political scientist at Columbia University, "the risk for China is that this scandal could taint everyone in power and challenge the legitimacy of the regime". Furthermore, he said, “All the worst things you ever imagined are actually true” and “It’s not like nobody knew about this stuff, but now they know that it really is true and it’s as bad as it can possibly be.” [13]
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: date and year (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)
Please lets us work together to make a good article with great cites.
Geraldshields11 (
talk)
19:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
This is valuable stuff. I think it's especially worthwhile to note that the model remains popular within pretty large segments of the population (particularly outside the business community and the intelligentsia), and that Bo's downfall and the subsequent unravelling is seen as a kind of victory for the Guangdong model. Are you going to make these edits? I'll take a closer look later (whether here or on the page—up to you).
Homunculus (
duihua)
19:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Gerald, I made some edits to incorporate your additions more into the rest of the section. I did not yet touch the material that begins "On June 29, 2010, at the World Cities Summit in Singapore" and continues through the end of the page. In some cases I think it can be better integrated (for instance, there are two places now where Li Zhuang is mentioned; seems this ought to be kept together in a coherent way), or perhaps the ideas can be made a little more clear. However, I'm having a bit of a hard time seeing the relevance of some of this to the Chongqing model specifically; much of it is about the scandal surrounding Bo Xilai and the implications for the princeling faction. What do you think? When I have more time I'll read through the sources you provided more carefully, and may have more thoughts. Regards, Homunculus ( duihua) 23:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Just curious about this edit [1] which removed mention of the surveillance operations as a component of the anti-crimes/corruption drive. The New York Times article describing this makes it pretty clear that the surveillance operations were part of the da hei campaign. Whether or not this is Bo Xilai's MO in generally isn't really the question, is it? Courting investment and planting trees are also components of Bo's policies that predated his arrival in Chongqing. Anyways, here's the excerpt from the Times:
Explanation would be appreciated. Homunculus ( duihua) 03:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MathewTownsend ( talk · contribs) 20:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
MathewTownsend ( talk) 12:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
Congratulations! MathewTownsend ( talk) 15:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Chongqing model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)