This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article reads like a PR page... examples include "Chloe is shown to be very sweet and modest ... and has a reputation among them for being especially studious" "At competitions, she usually places high and often wins". GoddersUK ( talk) 15:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Chloe was the best on Dance Moms and has a brighter future than half of the children in this doomed country.
Thank you for adding the page back. I have been adding references and citations, and I have more to add, including competitions she has won. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.218.199.150 ( talk) 00:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Please, please, PLEASE do not unlock this page on January 6. There is a group of people on Facebook who have plans to vandalize this page again as soon as protection is lifted. Please keep it locked down as long as possible. Chloe is a minor and needs to be protected from these people. 199.66.65.98 ( talk) 10:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)CucFan
Three editors have now removed the minor surgery Lukasiak had as trivial. The problem had zero impact on her career. If the surgery were significant, it would be widely covered in reliable sources. I see no indication of such coverage.
If you disagree, feel free to discuss the issue. (Edit warring behind an anonymous IP is no longer an option.) - SummerPhD v2.0 00:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
This article lists in three places that Lukasiak is a fashion designer (under occupation in infobox, in lead and in it's own section "Fashion career"). I propose this is removed from the article as the original source for this was an appearance on the TV show "The Doctors" on Oct 13, 2015, in which she said " ... and I have a line coming out with two major retailers, which I'm really excited about, but I can't say who, but i'm going to announce it soon." It is inaccurate to conclude she is the designer of this yet to be seen fashion line 3 months later instead of modelling for the fashion line (like she has done previously, as stated in this article). Either way her stating something doesn't make it accurate or noteworthy. Sgcosh ( talk) 18:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
This article about a living person is currently poorly sourced. It currently has 24 references listed, out of which 5 are from youtube, 6 from social media / the persons own website and and 8 from International Business Times (6 of which are the same author), raising the issue of lack of notability of the person and their work. Is someone willing to bring the article's sources up to a reliable standard, otherwise unsourced or poorly sourced material will be removed. Please see WP:RSE, and WP:NOYT for reliable source guidelines. Sgcosh ( talk) 14:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
An editor keeps removing the date of birth of the subject and the Personal life section of the article, citing as a reason to do so a Wikipedia joke page as well as insisting that the information is "trivial". Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons allows for both of these in an article, and most BLP articles on Wikipedia have both of them. WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:PUBLICFIGURE give allowances for facts such as the subject's marriage, divorce, dating, etc. as long as the article simply documents what reliable sources say. WP:DOB allows the use of the subject's date of birth (unless they complain) and WP:BLPSELFPUB allows citing it to the primary source of subject's website (subject to conditions which are met by this article). I have reverted the editor's attempt to keep this out of the article. If the editor wishes to discuss it below after reading the linked policy, they are welcome to do so. Prhartcom ( talk) 16:44, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Prhartcom ( talk) 17:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Scr★pIron IV 20:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
ScrapIronIV, it's fine that you are maintaining integrity of this article, but you're going to have to cite Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines instead of repeatedly citing a Wikipedia joke as justification for your actions, as there is a difference between the two (one was intended to guide editors and the other was intended only to amuse and not meant to be taken seriously). Any further edits of yours that cite of a joke instead of a policy in the future will be reverted. I hope this explanation of the difference was helpful, and thanks for maintaining the article. Prhartcom ( talk) 14:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Her appearances as a guest on 'The Today Show' (2011), 'Anderson Live' & 'Katie' (2012) and 'good morning america' (2013) should be removed from the television section as they are not notable events. Actors and celebrities frequently attend 100s of TV interviews throughout their careers, these do not automatically meet the notability requirements for inclusion on wikipedia. They have been previously removed from this article and reinstated by other editors without providing a reason for including them. It's now been 10 months since I attached 'citation needed' tags, and no editors have provided any citations. Adhering to WP:BLP i'm removing the unsourced content. Please use the talk page if you think the content merits inclusion in this article. On the other hand her appearances on 'The View' and 'The Doctors' do merit inclusion in this article as her performance / interviews from those appearances have been covered by reliable sources. Secondly with regards to the Awards section. Teen Magazine online polls such as J-14 fail to meet notability requirements for wikipedia. There is no actual award, it's just an annual online poll the magazine runs for its readers. Numerous magazines and websites now do this and call them 'awards'. Seeing as they lack an actual award, and they are not covered by sources outwith the magazines themselves, I fail to be convinced that these online polls should be included on wikipedia. Sgcosh ( talk) 14:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article reads like a PR page... examples include "Chloe is shown to be very sweet and modest ... and has a reputation among them for being especially studious" "At competitions, she usually places high and often wins". GoddersUK ( talk) 15:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Chloe was the best on Dance Moms and has a brighter future than half of the children in this doomed country.
Thank you for adding the page back. I have been adding references and citations, and I have more to add, including competitions she has won. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.218.199.150 ( talk) 00:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Please, please, PLEASE do not unlock this page on January 6. There is a group of people on Facebook who have plans to vandalize this page again as soon as protection is lifted. Please keep it locked down as long as possible. Chloe is a minor and needs to be protected from these people. 199.66.65.98 ( talk) 10:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)CucFan
Three editors have now removed the minor surgery Lukasiak had as trivial. The problem had zero impact on her career. If the surgery were significant, it would be widely covered in reliable sources. I see no indication of such coverage.
If you disagree, feel free to discuss the issue. (Edit warring behind an anonymous IP is no longer an option.) - SummerPhD v2.0 00:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
This article lists in three places that Lukasiak is a fashion designer (under occupation in infobox, in lead and in it's own section "Fashion career"). I propose this is removed from the article as the original source for this was an appearance on the TV show "The Doctors" on Oct 13, 2015, in which she said " ... and I have a line coming out with two major retailers, which I'm really excited about, but I can't say who, but i'm going to announce it soon." It is inaccurate to conclude she is the designer of this yet to be seen fashion line 3 months later instead of modelling for the fashion line (like she has done previously, as stated in this article). Either way her stating something doesn't make it accurate or noteworthy. Sgcosh ( talk) 18:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
This article about a living person is currently poorly sourced. It currently has 24 references listed, out of which 5 are from youtube, 6 from social media / the persons own website and and 8 from International Business Times (6 of which are the same author), raising the issue of lack of notability of the person and their work. Is someone willing to bring the article's sources up to a reliable standard, otherwise unsourced or poorly sourced material will be removed. Please see WP:RSE, and WP:NOYT for reliable source guidelines. Sgcosh ( talk) 14:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
An editor keeps removing the date of birth of the subject and the Personal life section of the article, citing as a reason to do so a Wikipedia joke page as well as insisting that the information is "trivial". Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons allows for both of these in an article, and most BLP articles on Wikipedia have both of them. WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:PUBLICFIGURE give allowances for facts such as the subject's marriage, divorce, dating, etc. as long as the article simply documents what reliable sources say. WP:DOB allows the use of the subject's date of birth (unless they complain) and WP:BLPSELFPUB allows citing it to the primary source of subject's website (subject to conditions which are met by this article). I have reverted the editor's attempt to keep this out of the article. If the editor wishes to discuss it below after reading the linked policy, they are welcome to do so. Prhartcom ( talk) 16:44, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Prhartcom ( talk) 17:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Scr★pIron IV 20:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
ScrapIronIV, it's fine that you are maintaining integrity of this article, but you're going to have to cite Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines instead of repeatedly citing a Wikipedia joke as justification for your actions, as there is a difference between the two (one was intended to guide editors and the other was intended only to amuse and not meant to be taken seriously). Any further edits of yours that cite of a joke instead of a policy in the future will be reverted. I hope this explanation of the difference was helpful, and thanks for maintaining the article. Prhartcom ( talk) 14:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Her appearances as a guest on 'The Today Show' (2011), 'Anderson Live' & 'Katie' (2012) and 'good morning america' (2013) should be removed from the television section as they are not notable events. Actors and celebrities frequently attend 100s of TV interviews throughout their careers, these do not automatically meet the notability requirements for inclusion on wikipedia. They have been previously removed from this article and reinstated by other editors without providing a reason for including them. It's now been 10 months since I attached 'citation needed' tags, and no editors have provided any citations. Adhering to WP:BLP i'm removing the unsourced content. Please use the talk page if you think the content merits inclusion in this article. On the other hand her appearances on 'The View' and 'The Doctors' do merit inclusion in this article as her performance / interviews from those appearances have been covered by reliable sources. Secondly with regards to the Awards section. Teen Magazine online polls such as J-14 fail to meet notability requirements for wikipedia. There is no actual award, it's just an annual online poll the magazine runs for its readers. Numerous magazines and websites now do this and call them 'awards'. Seeing as they lack an actual award, and they are not covered by sources outwith the magazines themselves, I fail to be convinced that these online polls should be included on wikipedia. Sgcosh ( talk) 14:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)