![]() | Chittor Fort was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 9, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Rani Padmini in 1433 AD and
Rani Karnavati in 1537 AD led the
jauhar or
self-immolation ritual by over 13,000 ladies of
Rajput warriors who died in battles at
Chittorgarh Fort (pictured)? |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 06:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Reviewer: SBC-YPR ( talk) 11:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article over the next several days. The version I will be reviewing is this one, dated 2010-02-21, and any subsequent changes will not form part of the review. Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 11:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I have assessed the article against the six good article criteria, and commented in detail below:
1. Writing:
2. Sourcing:
3. Broadness:
4. Neutrality: The article seems to represent viewpoints fairly and without bias, although (as pointed out above) the sources for some of the claims need to be verified.
5. Stability: The article has not changed significantly from day to day or been the subject of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Images:
As a result of the above, I am unfortunately compelled to fail the article since in my opinion, it requires a lot of rewriting and thorough copyediting, and more importantly better sourcing, which could take some time to be addressed thoroughly. I would suggest you look out for better references, especially history books, and use them in the article, duly replacing the existing sources.
If you believe that I have applied the fail criteria inappropriately, or have any other concerns about the conduct of this review, you can list it on the Good article reassessment page for discussion by other GA reviewers. Alternatively you may wish to address the issues raised above and then renominate the article on the Good article nominations page. Please also feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 17:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
322 BC–185 BC muraian empire than how the build it chitor fort in 700 AD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.59.66 ( talk) 15:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
iblogger.org is on the blacklist [1] so images from it should not be used. See also the whitelist discussion| [2]
Graeme374 ( talk) 04:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
In the Precincts section we are told that the Chittorgarh Fort:
אביהו ( talk) 08:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
It was between two kings not between two religions 117.228.223.160 ( talk) 06:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Chittor Fort was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 9, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Rani Padmini in 1433 AD and
Rani Karnavati in 1537 AD led the
jauhar or
self-immolation ritual by over 13,000 ladies of
Rajput warriors who died in battles at
Chittorgarh Fort (pictured)? |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 06:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Reviewer: SBC-YPR ( talk) 11:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article over the next several days. The version I will be reviewing is this one, dated 2010-02-21, and any subsequent changes will not form part of the review. Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 11:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I have assessed the article against the six good article criteria, and commented in detail below:
1. Writing:
2. Sourcing:
3. Broadness:
4. Neutrality: The article seems to represent viewpoints fairly and without bias, although (as pointed out above) the sources for some of the claims need to be verified.
5. Stability: The article has not changed significantly from day to day or been the subject of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Images:
As a result of the above, I am unfortunately compelled to fail the article since in my opinion, it requires a lot of rewriting and thorough copyediting, and more importantly better sourcing, which could take some time to be addressed thoroughly. I would suggest you look out for better references, especially history books, and use them in the article, duly replacing the existing sources.
If you believe that I have applied the fail criteria inappropriately, or have any other concerns about the conduct of this review, you can list it on the Good article reassessment page for discussion by other GA reviewers. Alternatively you may wish to address the issues raised above and then renominate the article on the Good article nominations page. Please also feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, SBC-YPR ( talk) 17:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
322 BC–185 BC muraian empire than how the build it chitor fort in 700 AD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.59.66 ( talk) 15:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
iblogger.org is on the blacklist [1] so images from it should not be used. See also the whitelist discussion| [2]
Graeme374 ( talk) 04:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
In the Precincts section we are told that the Chittorgarh Fort:
אביהו ( talk) 08:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
It was between two kings not between two religions 117.228.223.160 ( talk) 06:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)