GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Urve ( talk · contribs) 12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I will begin reviewing this soon. Thanks,
Urve
12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
the river Thames- small point, but I like the decision to leave river uncapitalized
c.is fine; you may consider {{ circa}}
until late in the nineteenth centurybut that is what the source says, so I think it's okay. (Their claim that by the 1910s there was development, so it had to be in the late 1800s, is not very convincing to me, but we are guided by RSs, not what I think.)
1589-90- en dash instead of hyphen, yes?
described as late 17th and early 18th century- how so? in style? in evidence that it was constructed then? not too sure what precisely this means
Of the same period is the Grade II pair of three-storey brown brick houses, Lingard House, with a dormer, and Thames View- what is a dormer?
periodicallyoffered based on the citations we have. what do you think? the first showcases current access, and the second is a specific event. am I missing something?
That is all I have for the prose right now. I haven't taken a look at the copyright information for all of the images, but for what I did, they look good. The sources are reliable and support the statements (note the issue I have in culture). Urve 13:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Unfortunately, there is not too much more to say here. You have already curated a wonderful article, and with the revisions you've made, I am convinced it meets the GA criteria. Congratulations and best of luck on your future ones! Passing shortly,
Urve (
talk)
15:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Urve ( talk · contribs) 12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I will begin reviewing this soon. Thanks,
Urve
12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
the river Thames- small point, but I like the decision to leave river uncapitalized
c.is fine; you may consider {{ circa}}
until late in the nineteenth centurybut that is what the source says, so I think it's okay. (Their claim that by the 1910s there was development, so it had to be in the late 1800s, is not very convincing to me, but we are guided by RSs, not what I think.)
1589-90- en dash instead of hyphen, yes?
described as late 17th and early 18th century- how so? in style? in evidence that it was constructed then? not too sure what precisely this means
Of the same period is the Grade II pair of three-storey brown brick houses, Lingard House, with a dormer, and Thames View- what is a dormer?
periodicallyoffered based on the citations we have. what do you think? the first showcases current access, and the second is a specific event. am I missing something?
That is all I have for the prose right now. I haven't taken a look at the copyright information for all of the images, but for what I did, they look good. The sources are reliable and support the statements (note the issue I have in culture). Urve 13:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Unfortunately, there is not too much more to say here. You have already curated a wonderful article, and with the revisions you've made, I am convinced it meets the GA criteria. Congratulations and best of luck on your future ones! Passing shortly,
Urve (
talk)
15:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)