Chiswick Mall has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 1, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Urve ( talk · contribs) 12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I will begin reviewing this soon. Thanks,
Urve 12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
the river Thames- small point, but I like the decision to leave river uncapitalized
c.is fine; you may consider {{ circa}}
until late in the nineteenth centurybut that is what the source says, so I think it's okay. (Their claim that by the 1910s there was development, so it had to be in the late 1800s, is not very convincing to me, but we are guided by RSs, not what I think.)
1589-90- en dash instead of hyphen, yes?
described as late 17th and early 18th century- how so? in style? in evidence that it was constructed then? not too sure what precisely this means
Of the same period is the Grade II pair of three-storey brown brick houses, Lingard House, with a dormer, and Thames View- what is a dormer?
periodicallyoffered based on the citations we have. what do you think? the first showcases current access, and the second is a specific event. am I missing something?
That is all I have for the prose right now. I haven't taken a look at the copyright information for all of the images, but for what I did, they look good. The sources are reliable and support the statements (note the issue I have in culture). Urve 13:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Unfortunately, there is not too much more to say here. You have already curated a wonderful article, and with the revisions you've made, I am convinced it meets the GA criteria. Congratulations and best of luck on your future ones! Passing shortly,
Urve (
talk) 15:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Chiswick Mall has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 1, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Urve ( talk · contribs) 12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I will begin reviewing this soon. Thanks,
Urve 12:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
the river Thames- small point, but I like the decision to leave river uncapitalized
c.is fine; you may consider {{ circa}}
until late in the nineteenth centurybut that is what the source says, so I think it's okay. (Their claim that by the 1910s there was development, so it had to be in the late 1800s, is not very convincing to me, but we are guided by RSs, not what I think.)
1589-90- en dash instead of hyphen, yes?
described as late 17th and early 18th century- how so? in style? in evidence that it was constructed then? not too sure what precisely this means
Of the same period is the Grade II pair of three-storey brown brick houses, Lingard House, with a dormer, and Thames View- what is a dormer?
periodicallyoffered based on the citations we have. what do you think? the first showcases current access, and the second is a specific event. am I missing something?
That is all I have for the prose right now. I haven't taken a look at the copyright information for all of the images, but for what I did, they look good. The sources are reliable and support the statements (note the issue I have in culture). Urve 13:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Unfortunately, there is not too much more to say here. You have already curated a wonderful article, and with the revisions you've made, I am convinced it meets the GA criteria. Congratulations and best of luck on your future ones! Passing shortly,
Urve (
talk) 15:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)