This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
It is requested that a map or maps, showing the pyramids, be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in China may be able to help! |
What latitude and longitude are these pyramids at? Are they on Google Earth?-- Darrelljon 16:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
This article is more about American "sightings" of Chinese pyramids. There should be more info on the actual pyramids themselves. The "sightings" are irrelevant because we know the actual locations, nature, and appearance of these pyramids. I don't have any sources on-hand though so can't edit. -- Sumple ( Talk) 23:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree! Something needs to be done! "It is now known, thanks to efforts of Chris Maier, that the particular pyramid shown in the photo is the Maoling Mausoleum of emperor Wu of Han" -- as if the Chinese needed some bloody pompous German to tell them where and what their own tourist attractions are. The whole article is almost colonial in tone. (Perhaps not surprising, as the whole thing is so ... German.) However, there is a reason for this. It simply reflects the level of knowledge almost 100 % of the English-speaking world has of these mounds. A sinologist needs to look into it.
Yeah, well, if some guy in Germany with illogical conspiracy theories about how the Chinese government is trying to hide these graves by planting trees on them (!) is viewed as more interesting than the pyramids itself, I understand it can be offensive. And that’s how the article stands today, with 280 words about "recognition in the west" (surely the most interesting thing about themNOT ;) and 40 about the pyramids themselves. I mean, you’re both right. I think the anonymous commentator is especially correct in that there is no decent information to find in the English language, so we can’t fix it!!! :( Bossk-Office 06:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
I've restored the Great White Pyramid to the list; even if its actual existence is unconfirmed, reports of it are the main reason China's pyramid's first came to the attention of the rest of the world. -- Gene_poole 06:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
this pyramids was built by Ancient Turkic people.
please research this.
the bodies of chinese emperors were found in the tombs. so your saying turks built a pyramid for chinese emperors??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.246.158 ( talk) 04:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Let's see some reliable sources for Turkic inscriptions. Dougweller ( talk) 20:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Gene, I saw that you reverted my edits on a couple of pyramid related pages to include links to the pages on Ukrainian and Bosnian pyramids (and for links to the pyramid category as well). I just wanted to clarify why these links do not belong. The Bosnian "pyramid" is considered a hoax. If the digging on the Bosnian hill does eventually reveal a pyramid, then the links are justified. However, until proof of a pyramid is found, the site remains a hill, with an archeologically significant medieval village on top. In the case of the Ukrainian pyramid, the press simply carried a wrong impression of the site into the popular culture. This innacuracy was soon clarified by the archaeologist in charge. Hiberniantears 12:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not revert the external links sections of pyramid articles again. I am well aware that the Bosnian and Ukrainian "pramids" are not really pyramids, and that the scientific consensus supports this - however that is entirely beside the point; the main reason they are known by most people is because some people claimed they were pyramids; it is not for us to make value judgements concerning those claims; our job is simply to provide links to all pyramid-elated articles and let people read those articles and decide for themselves. The "see also" list is a list of related subjects - it is not merely a list of "legitimate pyramids". --Gene_poole 01:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Having just researched on this topic, I would like to state that some scientists, especially Kazım Mirşan (a scientist born in Chinese borders) support the hypothesis that these pyramids were built by Turkic people. Although it is known that Turkic people did not exist back than, he also supports the hypothesis that they actually did exist. He states that that actual pyramids are in an izolated zone where no one can enter. I have not read any of his book (there are more than 10 I believe) so my knowlegde is very limited but I've read that the reason which made him start believe that Turkic people did exist was that the first inscriptions of Turkic people (Orhun Tablets) were so developped that these people mush have been around for another 3000 years. 85.103.8.79 19:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a repository of crap machine-translated from French. So I deleted it. Someone feel free to rewrite it in intellig’ble English. Bossk-Office ( talk) 20:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
From http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramides_chinoises (translated)
Pyramids-tumuli Shaanxi, the most numerous. Many were found within a radius of about one hundred kilometers from Xi'an, ancient capital of China (with Luoyang in Henan). Almost seventy emperors had their principal residence, the royal and aristocratic tombs, typically in the form of burial mounds.
Pyramides-tumuli du Shandong Pyramids-tumuli ShandongTwo tumuli near Mount Dingzushan (鼎足山) would, according to tradition, the tombs of dukes and Jing Huan (景公) in the seventh and fifth centuries BC. J.-C., but archeologists contemporaries offer rather as occupants of the sovereign fourth century BC. Four other tumuli near Mount Nanshan (南山) and would be the mausoleums of the Dukes kings Wei (威王), Xuan (宣王), Min (闵王) and Xiang (襄王) the third century BC. J.-C.. AD. The tumuli are aligned according to orients to the north are other graves that are believed to be those of queens and ministers
Tumulus of Shaohao to the east of Qufu. Although the exact identity of the owner is uncertain, it is considered long as the tomb of the legendary king and has since the eleventh century temple worship where it is made.
Pyramids and tumuli attributed to the Hongshan culture (红山, 4700-2900 BC.)
Tumuli funeral and pyramid (unknown function) Niuheliang site (牛河粱) discovered in 1981 in the confines of Jianping County (Chaoyang, western Liaoning). Nearby, the remains of areas and buildings where worship were found effigies of women.Niuheliang is on the list of candidates for World Heritage.
Nach Angaben von chinesischen Behörden handelt es sich bei ihnen um Grabhügel von Herrschern der westlichen Han-Dynastie. [1].-- Felix Folio Secundus ( talk) 10:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |hrsg=
(
help)
It's not correct to call them Chinese pyramids, simple because they're located in China. China has been areas lots of non Chinese people have lived. Thus pyramids in China is more neutral and reasoable.
If they are really chinesse pyramids why chinesse government is hiding them with trees? And china is not using them as cultural image or touristic places Its not logical!-- 85.100.79.243 ( talk) 23:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The trees are always there, it's Chinesse tradition to plant tree on tomb mounts. So that life would cycle back in leaves and seeds. And most the pyramids has websites, such the one in the picture on the main page. [1]
May be some greek culture affected guys are so disturbed from using or discussing the Turkic or Turkish name here, but come on every possibility and probability should be invetigated,and the Turkic hypotesis is the one of them.Please dont mix your ideology in that type of studies or researches.-- 85.100.79.243 ( talk) 00:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
References
The pyramid comparison chart was removed due to it being a piece of racial propagandist rubbish. If you're going to include that hotel as the largest pyramid, then you ought to include the tallest building in the world as well. The Shard was tossed in at a later date to make the racial self-aggrandizement less apparent. Likewise, the Chinese pyramid listed is only taller than the Mesoamerican ones because of a 'projected' height speculated by scholars, rather than the actual height--hence the dashed line. As with the Shard, a collapsed Egyptian pyramid was added later to give the impression of unbiased neutrality. (It seems like every single time I look something up on Wikipedia, a certain group of Wikipedians is embellishing their people's history, often at the expense of another group, and it is sickening that no one opposes them!) Anti-racialpropaganda ( talk) 04:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
ok, and where is this mysterious The Science News-Letter, Vol. 51, No. 15. (Apr. 12, 1947), pp. 232-233? I searched the Sciencemagazin with a number of search terms and didn't find it. doi please or exact Link -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 21:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop removing materials that are related with the ancient legends of these Chinese pyramids or is there something to hide? it's up to you if you want to believe it but please do not remove material that are related with these pyramids. I would put Alien theory on my next edit, please do not deny all the evidences that are related with these ancient pyramids but if you do remove it please explain why you did it.. ( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:25, 20 may 2013
:YOU WANT MAINSTREAM SCIENTIFIC SOURCE? HERE........... -----------------> http://rense.com/general29/chin.htm
( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:43, 20 may 2013
Weekly World News 10 Sep 2002
( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:59 May 20 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 21:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:59 May 20 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 21:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
acknowledgement by CCN world news on Alien pyarmids of China had been acknowledge, request to edit this in " Alien theory " section http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/06/20/china.aliens/
BEIJING, China -- A team of Chinese scientists is to head out to the far west of the country to investigate a mystery pyramid that local legend says is a launch tower left by aliens from space.
Nine scientists will travel this month to probe the origins of the 50-60 meter (165-198 ft) tall structure -- dubbed "the ET relics" -- in the western province of Qinghai, China's state-run Xinhua agency said on Wednesday.
The mystery pyramid sits on Mount Baigong, has three caves with triangular openings on its facade and is filled with red-hued pipes leading into the mountain and a nearby salt water lake, Xinhua said.
Rusty iron scraps, pipes and unusually shaped stones are scattered around the inhospitable and largely uninhabited area, it said.
ET theory
CNN.com Asia More news from our Asia edition
A research fellow at a nearby observatory of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Yang Ji, told Xinhua the theory the pyramid was created by extra terrestrials was "understandable and worth looking into."
"But scientific means must be employed to prove whether or not it is true," Yang said.
Xinhua has not given any details on the age of the structure, or any other possible explanations for it.
But a study carried out by a local smeltery suggests the pipes are very old, Liu Shaolin, the engineer who carried out the analysis, told Xinhua.
These findings have made the site more mysterious, says Qin Jianwen, a spokesman for the Delingha government.
"Nature is harsh here. There are no residents let alone modern industry in the area, only a few migrant herdsmen to the north of the mountain," Qin said.
This will be the first time scientists are heading out to study the mysterious site near Delingha City in the depths of the Qaidam Basin, according to sources with the Haixi Mongolian and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. -- ( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 10:55 May 20 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 21:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
OK, it can seem weird but maybe this is backfire of wiki strict (intransigent?) policies. There are more and more findings everyday that sugests a "new inclusive history" covering strange anomalies all around the world . Wiki needs more openess, not dictatorship. Thanks and love. -- JKim ( talk) 22:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
There are enough sources to do this now. Doug Weller talk 20:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chinese pyramids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
From this,we can see the Publicity Department of China is so failed that so many people belive this kind of "too young too simple" STORY which arbitrarily invented by other counties(such as t/Turkey ) and wrote in WIKI.(Maybe "Wiki" rhymes with "Turkey"?) 自此我们可以看出,中国的宣传部门是有多么的失败,以至于其他国家[比如土(尔)鸡/其]任意编造的如此“图样图森破”的故事竟然能够让如此多的相信并载入维基?(毕竟维基和土耳其是押韵的?) To those respected、patriotic、knowledgeable、awake Turks(Maybe continues "Turks in Soul"?)。I——a fatheaded、non-professional、offensive young really want to know if Xiongnu those forefathers identified by YOU know this news in HEAVEN, how will they think?"Builded these pyramids for own nemesis?"(In fact,owners of these pyramids,the BIG WORK of emproers in Qin[cf. Meng Tian] and Han[cf. Han–Xiongnu War] is "Driving Xiongnu to further north[perhaps the Anatolia lol]") 给那些尊敬的、富有爱国心的、博学的、清醒的土耳其人(也许还有“精神土耳其人”?)。我,一个愚钝的、非专业的、冒昧的年轻人,非常想知道若是被您们认定先父的匈奴人会怎么想?“为了自己的死敌建造这些金字塔?”(事实上这些金字塔的主人——无论秦朝还是汉朝皇帝的大事业都是“北驱匈奴[也许是赶到安纳托利亚?( ﹁ ﹁ ) ~→]”) In addition,let me explain why Old Chinese(or Han Chinese) plant trees on these so called "pyramids"——According to Book of Rites,Chapter "Royal Regulations", Section 25 "The common people let the coffin down into the grave by ropes, and did not suspend the interment because of rain. They raised no mound, nor planted trees over the grave."(cf. http://ctext.org/liji/wang-zhi ,P.S How pithily is sentence in Classical Chinese); 另外,让我解释下为什么古代中国人(或汉族)要在“金字塔”上种树的原因——《礼记·王制》(第25节)中写着“庶人县封,葬不为雨止,不封不树,丧不贰事”, According to I Ching,Chapter "Xi Ci II",Section 2, Sentence 12 "When the ancients buried their dead, they covered the body thickly with pieces of wood, having laid it in the open country. They raised no mound over it, nor planted trees around; nor had they any fixed period for mourning."(cf. http://ctext.org/book-of-changes/xi-ci-xia) 《易经·系辞下》(第2段。第12行)中写着“古之葬者,厚衣之以薪,葬之中野,不封不树,丧期无数。” In other words, only graves of"modern people"(Of couse it's to era that I-ching been writen. i.e. Western Zhou 1046–771 BC) and "non common people" can be planted trees.. 也就是说只有“现在的人”(当然是指易经写作时的“现代人”,也就是公元前1046到公元前771年间)和“非普通的人”的坟墓才可以被种上树。 P.S. These graves are not pyramids, becaus they haven't the apex(Maybe for show the respect to Tian,becaus if the grave have apex likes stabing to Sky/Heaven/Tian) 另外,这些陵墓不是金字塔,因为他们没有尖顶(也许是为了表示对“天”的尊敬,毕竟坟墓有了尖顶,就像是在“刺天”) If you come to this place in China,and you will find there is not any Enter Injunction, any Turks symbol,or any Occult Fact,only "people mountain people see" tourists from all over the world (especially in Chinese vocation,such as 1 may、1 oct.-7 oct.) 如果你来到这些在中国的地方,你就会发现没有什么进入禁令、什么土耳其象征或什么被“隐藏的真相”,只有来着世界各地的“人山人海”的游客(特别是在中国的假期)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chinese pyramids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
It is requested that a map or maps, showing the pyramids, be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in China may be able to help! |
What latitude and longitude are these pyramids at? Are they on Google Earth?-- Darrelljon 16:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
This article is more about American "sightings" of Chinese pyramids. There should be more info on the actual pyramids themselves. The "sightings" are irrelevant because we know the actual locations, nature, and appearance of these pyramids. I don't have any sources on-hand though so can't edit. -- Sumple ( Talk) 23:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree! Something needs to be done! "It is now known, thanks to efforts of Chris Maier, that the particular pyramid shown in the photo is the Maoling Mausoleum of emperor Wu of Han" -- as if the Chinese needed some bloody pompous German to tell them where and what their own tourist attractions are. The whole article is almost colonial in tone. (Perhaps not surprising, as the whole thing is so ... German.) However, there is a reason for this. It simply reflects the level of knowledge almost 100 % of the English-speaking world has of these mounds. A sinologist needs to look into it.
Yeah, well, if some guy in Germany with illogical conspiracy theories about how the Chinese government is trying to hide these graves by planting trees on them (!) is viewed as more interesting than the pyramids itself, I understand it can be offensive. And that’s how the article stands today, with 280 words about "recognition in the west" (surely the most interesting thing about themNOT ;) and 40 about the pyramids themselves. I mean, you’re both right. I think the anonymous commentator is especially correct in that there is no decent information to find in the English language, so we can’t fix it!!! :( Bossk-Office 06:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
I've restored the Great White Pyramid to the list; even if its actual existence is unconfirmed, reports of it are the main reason China's pyramid's first came to the attention of the rest of the world. -- Gene_poole 06:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
this pyramids was built by Ancient Turkic people.
please research this.
the bodies of chinese emperors were found in the tombs. so your saying turks built a pyramid for chinese emperors??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.246.158 ( talk) 04:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Let's see some reliable sources for Turkic inscriptions. Dougweller ( talk) 20:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Gene, I saw that you reverted my edits on a couple of pyramid related pages to include links to the pages on Ukrainian and Bosnian pyramids (and for links to the pyramid category as well). I just wanted to clarify why these links do not belong. The Bosnian "pyramid" is considered a hoax. If the digging on the Bosnian hill does eventually reveal a pyramid, then the links are justified. However, until proof of a pyramid is found, the site remains a hill, with an archeologically significant medieval village on top. In the case of the Ukrainian pyramid, the press simply carried a wrong impression of the site into the popular culture. This innacuracy was soon clarified by the archaeologist in charge. Hiberniantears 12:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not revert the external links sections of pyramid articles again. I am well aware that the Bosnian and Ukrainian "pramids" are not really pyramids, and that the scientific consensus supports this - however that is entirely beside the point; the main reason they are known by most people is because some people claimed they were pyramids; it is not for us to make value judgements concerning those claims; our job is simply to provide links to all pyramid-elated articles and let people read those articles and decide for themselves. The "see also" list is a list of related subjects - it is not merely a list of "legitimate pyramids". --Gene_poole 01:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Having just researched on this topic, I would like to state that some scientists, especially Kazım Mirşan (a scientist born in Chinese borders) support the hypothesis that these pyramids were built by Turkic people. Although it is known that Turkic people did not exist back than, he also supports the hypothesis that they actually did exist. He states that that actual pyramids are in an izolated zone where no one can enter. I have not read any of his book (there are more than 10 I believe) so my knowlegde is very limited but I've read that the reason which made him start believe that Turkic people did exist was that the first inscriptions of Turkic people (Orhun Tablets) were so developped that these people mush have been around for another 3000 years. 85.103.8.79 19:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a repository of crap machine-translated from French. So I deleted it. Someone feel free to rewrite it in intellig’ble English. Bossk-Office ( talk) 20:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
From http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramides_chinoises (translated)
Pyramids-tumuli Shaanxi, the most numerous. Many were found within a radius of about one hundred kilometers from Xi'an, ancient capital of China (with Luoyang in Henan). Almost seventy emperors had their principal residence, the royal and aristocratic tombs, typically in the form of burial mounds.
Pyramides-tumuli du Shandong Pyramids-tumuli ShandongTwo tumuli near Mount Dingzushan (鼎足山) would, according to tradition, the tombs of dukes and Jing Huan (景公) in the seventh and fifth centuries BC. J.-C., but archeologists contemporaries offer rather as occupants of the sovereign fourth century BC. Four other tumuli near Mount Nanshan (南山) and would be the mausoleums of the Dukes kings Wei (威王), Xuan (宣王), Min (闵王) and Xiang (襄王) the third century BC. J.-C.. AD. The tumuli are aligned according to orients to the north are other graves that are believed to be those of queens and ministers
Tumulus of Shaohao to the east of Qufu. Although the exact identity of the owner is uncertain, it is considered long as the tomb of the legendary king and has since the eleventh century temple worship where it is made.
Pyramids and tumuli attributed to the Hongshan culture (红山, 4700-2900 BC.)
Tumuli funeral and pyramid (unknown function) Niuheliang site (牛河粱) discovered in 1981 in the confines of Jianping County (Chaoyang, western Liaoning). Nearby, the remains of areas and buildings where worship were found effigies of women.Niuheliang is on the list of candidates for World Heritage.
Nach Angaben von chinesischen Behörden handelt es sich bei ihnen um Grabhügel von Herrschern der westlichen Han-Dynastie. [1].-- Felix Folio Secundus ( talk) 10:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |hrsg=
(
help)
It's not correct to call them Chinese pyramids, simple because they're located in China. China has been areas lots of non Chinese people have lived. Thus pyramids in China is more neutral and reasoable.
If they are really chinesse pyramids why chinesse government is hiding them with trees? And china is not using them as cultural image or touristic places Its not logical!-- 85.100.79.243 ( talk) 23:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The trees are always there, it's Chinesse tradition to plant tree on tomb mounts. So that life would cycle back in leaves and seeds. And most the pyramids has websites, such the one in the picture on the main page. [1]
May be some greek culture affected guys are so disturbed from using or discussing the Turkic or Turkish name here, but come on every possibility and probability should be invetigated,and the Turkic hypotesis is the one of them.Please dont mix your ideology in that type of studies or researches.-- 85.100.79.243 ( talk) 00:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
References
The pyramid comparison chart was removed due to it being a piece of racial propagandist rubbish. If you're going to include that hotel as the largest pyramid, then you ought to include the tallest building in the world as well. The Shard was tossed in at a later date to make the racial self-aggrandizement less apparent. Likewise, the Chinese pyramid listed is only taller than the Mesoamerican ones because of a 'projected' height speculated by scholars, rather than the actual height--hence the dashed line. As with the Shard, a collapsed Egyptian pyramid was added later to give the impression of unbiased neutrality. (It seems like every single time I look something up on Wikipedia, a certain group of Wikipedians is embellishing their people's history, often at the expense of another group, and it is sickening that no one opposes them!) Anti-racialpropaganda ( talk) 04:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
ok, and where is this mysterious The Science News-Letter, Vol. 51, No. 15. (Apr. 12, 1947), pp. 232-233? I searched the Sciencemagazin with a number of search terms and didn't find it. doi please or exact Link -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 21:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop removing materials that are related with the ancient legends of these Chinese pyramids or is there something to hide? it's up to you if you want to believe it but please do not remove material that are related with these pyramids. I would put Alien theory on my next edit, please do not deny all the evidences that are related with these ancient pyramids but if you do remove it please explain why you did it.. ( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:25, 20 may 2013
:YOU WANT MAINSTREAM SCIENTIFIC SOURCE? HERE........... -----------------> http://rense.com/general29/chin.htm
( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:43, 20 may 2013
Weekly World News 10 Sep 2002
( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:59 May 20 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 21:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 9:59 May 20 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 21:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
acknowledgement by CCN world news on Alien pyarmids of China had been acknowledge, request to edit this in " Alien theory " section http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/06/20/china.aliens/
BEIJING, China -- A team of Chinese scientists is to head out to the far west of the country to investigate a mystery pyramid that local legend says is a launch tower left by aliens from space.
Nine scientists will travel this month to probe the origins of the 50-60 meter (165-198 ft) tall structure -- dubbed "the ET relics" -- in the western province of Qinghai, China's state-run Xinhua agency said on Wednesday.
The mystery pyramid sits on Mount Baigong, has three caves with triangular openings on its facade and is filled with red-hued pipes leading into the mountain and a nearby salt water lake, Xinhua said.
Rusty iron scraps, pipes and unusually shaped stones are scattered around the inhospitable and largely uninhabited area, it said.
ET theory
CNN.com Asia More news from our Asia edition
A research fellow at a nearby observatory of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Yang Ji, told Xinhua the theory the pyramid was created by extra terrestrials was "understandable and worth looking into."
"But scientific means must be employed to prove whether or not it is true," Yang said.
Xinhua has not given any details on the age of the structure, or any other possible explanations for it.
But a study carried out by a local smeltery suggests the pipes are very old, Liu Shaolin, the engineer who carried out the analysis, told Xinhua.
These findings have made the site more mysterious, says Qin Jianwen, a spokesman for the Delingha government.
"Nature is harsh here. There are no residents let alone modern industry in the area, only a few migrant herdsmen to the north of the mountain," Qin said.
This will be the first time scientists are heading out to study the mysterious site near Delingha City in the depths of the Qaidam Basin, according to sources with the Haixi Mongolian and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. -- ( User:92.236.36.173 ( talk) 10:55 May 20 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 21:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
OK, it can seem weird but maybe this is backfire of wiki strict (intransigent?) policies. There are more and more findings everyday that sugests a "new inclusive history" covering strange anomalies all around the world . Wiki needs more openess, not dictatorship. Thanks and love. -- JKim ( talk) 22:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
There are enough sources to do this now. Doug Weller talk 20:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chinese pyramids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
From this,we can see the Publicity Department of China is so failed that so many people belive this kind of "too young too simple" STORY which arbitrarily invented by other counties(such as t/Turkey ) and wrote in WIKI.(Maybe "Wiki" rhymes with "Turkey"?) 自此我们可以看出,中国的宣传部门是有多么的失败,以至于其他国家[比如土(尔)鸡/其]任意编造的如此“图样图森破”的故事竟然能够让如此多的相信并载入维基?(毕竟维基和土耳其是押韵的?) To those respected、patriotic、knowledgeable、awake Turks(Maybe continues "Turks in Soul"?)。I——a fatheaded、non-professional、offensive young really want to know if Xiongnu those forefathers identified by YOU know this news in HEAVEN, how will they think?"Builded these pyramids for own nemesis?"(In fact,owners of these pyramids,the BIG WORK of emproers in Qin[cf. Meng Tian] and Han[cf. Han–Xiongnu War] is "Driving Xiongnu to further north[perhaps the Anatolia lol]") 给那些尊敬的、富有爱国心的、博学的、清醒的土耳其人(也许还有“精神土耳其人”?)。我,一个愚钝的、非专业的、冒昧的年轻人,非常想知道若是被您们认定先父的匈奴人会怎么想?“为了自己的死敌建造这些金字塔?”(事实上这些金字塔的主人——无论秦朝还是汉朝皇帝的大事业都是“北驱匈奴[也许是赶到安纳托利亚?( ﹁ ﹁ ) ~→]”) In addition,let me explain why Old Chinese(or Han Chinese) plant trees on these so called "pyramids"——According to Book of Rites,Chapter "Royal Regulations", Section 25 "The common people let the coffin down into the grave by ropes, and did not suspend the interment because of rain. They raised no mound, nor planted trees over the grave."(cf. http://ctext.org/liji/wang-zhi ,P.S How pithily is sentence in Classical Chinese); 另外,让我解释下为什么古代中国人(或汉族)要在“金字塔”上种树的原因——《礼记·王制》(第25节)中写着“庶人县封,葬不为雨止,不封不树,丧不贰事”, According to I Ching,Chapter "Xi Ci II",Section 2, Sentence 12 "When the ancients buried their dead, they covered the body thickly with pieces of wood, having laid it in the open country. They raised no mound over it, nor planted trees around; nor had they any fixed period for mourning."(cf. http://ctext.org/book-of-changes/xi-ci-xia) 《易经·系辞下》(第2段。第12行)中写着“古之葬者,厚衣之以薪,葬之中野,不封不树,丧期无数。” In other words, only graves of"modern people"(Of couse it's to era that I-ching been writen. i.e. Western Zhou 1046–771 BC) and "non common people" can be planted trees.. 也就是说只有“现在的人”(当然是指易经写作时的“现代人”,也就是公元前1046到公元前771年间)和“非普通的人”的坟墓才可以被种上树。 P.S. These graves are not pyramids, becaus they haven't the apex(Maybe for show the respect to Tian,becaus if the grave have apex likes stabing to Sky/Heaven/Tian) 另外,这些陵墓不是金字塔,因为他们没有尖顶(也许是为了表示对“天”的尊敬,毕竟坟墓有了尖顶,就像是在“刺天”) If you come to this place in China,and you will find there is not any Enter Injunction, any Turks symbol,or any Occult Fact,only "people mountain people see" tourists from all over the world (especially in Chinese vocation,such as 1 may、1 oct.-7 oct.) 如果你来到这些在中国的地方,你就会发现没有什么进入禁令、什么土耳其象征或什么被“隐藏的真相”,只有来着世界各地的“人山人海”的游客(特别是在中国的假期)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chinese pyramids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)