Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and links in right place.
Section 2;
The construction cost of the two ships went over budget; is a duplicate, this was already mentioned.
An attempt was later made to raise the Yuyuen, is it successful or not, mention that.
I've modified the sentence to make it clear it was unsuccessful. At least that's my interpretation of the source, since it states that attempts were made but I've not seen anything in any sources that indicate that this was a success.
Miyagawa (
talk)
10:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The image used in the infobox has some licensing template errors. Fix it. The same with the other image in section 2.1.
I've corrected the licence for the lead image (it was simply on entirely the wrong licence, since the image was not a reproduction of a work of art). I've removed the second image for the time being, since due to the lack of knowledge of the author, I'm unable to remove the error message.
Miyagawa (
talk)
00:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
I've rethought this and gone with "Imperial China". This isn't as important for this particular ship, but in certain articles it'll be useful to differentiate between Imperial, Republic and People's Republic (in some cases all three!).
Miyagawa (
talk)
21:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Thanks for reviewing, I've replied to your comments. Let me know if there is anything else. I've also found two images of Yuyuen on Flickr which I'd previously overlooked since they weren't published. Then it occurred to me that those photographs were taken in the UK prior to 1946 with an unknown author and therefore is now in PD regardless of what the uploader on Flickr listed as the copyright tag. So I'm going to take those over the commons shortly and then into the article.
Miyagawa (
talk)
10:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and links in right place.
Section 2;
The construction cost of the two ships went over budget; is a duplicate, this was already mentioned.
An attempt was later made to raise the Yuyuen, is it successful or not, mention that.
I've modified the sentence to make it clear it was unsuccessful. At least that's my interpretation of the source, since it states that attempts were made but I've not seen anything in any sources that indicate that this was a success.
Miyagawa (
talk)
10:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The image used in the infobox has some licensing template errors. Fix it. The same with the other image in section 2.1.
I've corrected the licence for the lead image (it was simply on entirely the wrong licence, since the image was not a reproduction of a work of art). I've removed the second image for the time being, since due to the lack of knowledge of the author, I'm unable to remove the error message.
Miyagawa (
talk)
00:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
I've rethought this and gone with "Imperial China". This isn't as important for this particular ship, but in certain articles it'll be useful to differentiate between Imperial, Republic and People's Republic (in some cases all three!).
Miyagawa (
talk)
21:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Thanks for reviewing, I've replied to your comments. Let me know if there is anything else. I've also found two images of Yuyuen on Flickr which I'd previously overlooked since they weren't published. Then it occurred to me that those photographs were taken in the UK prior to 1946 with an unknown author and therefore is now in PD regardless of what the uploader on Flickr listed as the copyright tag. So I'm going to take those over the commons shortly and then into the article.
Miyagawa (
talk)
10:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply