This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chinese family of scripts article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Writing systems Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. East Asia ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Southeast Asia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 22 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Chinese scripts. The result of the discussion was not moved.

To-do list for Chinese family of scripts:  ·  history ·  watch ·  refresh · Updated 2024-03-14 Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Expand : kana Nüshu Bai bowen bopomofo gugyeol hyangchal idu

@ Kanguole (one of infinite patience for answering my questions):

1. Do you think Orthographic borrowing between Chinese and Japanese could be its own article?
2. If not, is this the best article to write about that in?

Remsense 诉 04:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Um, what topic is that? Kanguole 08:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry for being unclear: the exchange of technical vocabulary between the two languages during the 19th and 20th centuries as orthographic/morphemic loans, as opposed to phonetic loans. Remsense 诉 08:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

OK, I would include Korean and Vietnamese too, though almost all of the coining of compounds occurred in China or Japan, and include coining the neologisms (or re-tasking classical phrases) as well as borrowing them. It seems like a subtopic of Sino-Xenic vocabularies (the last two paragraphs touch on this). The characters provided a ready mapping between languages, but only because the Classical Chinese words they denoted were already at home of each of the languages. There are lots of examples, and many different patterns, so it could well grow into an article. Not sure what the title would be, though. Kanguole 09:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Makes sense! I agree, Sino-Xenic vocabularies is a good spot for it. Thanks! Remsense 诉 09:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply