![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is Chief Warrant Officer (CWO) a separate article covering information already contained within the Warrant Officer article? Not to mention that the term "Chief Warrant Officer" is not exclusive to the Canadian armed forces. ( Born2flie 04:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
I have recommended a merge. ( Born2flie 05:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC))
I am informally suggesting that this page, Chief Petty Officer 1st Class, Regimental Sergeant-Major, and Warrant Officer be combined into a single article named Warrant Officer (Canada). ALthough the CPOs are not "called" WOs, they still have the same priveleges and entitlements, and thus would be better covered together. Comments before a formal porposal? - BillCJ 23:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I somehow doubt that the slip-on insigne for a chief warrant officer would feature the text "CADET". Can somebody check the correctness of this please? 85.178.75.53 ( talk) 19:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Able Seaman (rank) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 23:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chief warrant officer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/resourcelibrary/cyberpioneer/topics/articles/news/2012/jun/29jun12_news2.htmllWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
In the Forms of Address section, this makes no sense: "In the RCN, CWOs are never addressed as "Chief", this being a form of address reserved for chief petty officers." In the RCN, CWOs ARE chief petty officers. Chief petty officers first class, precisely. This statement would be true for the US Armed Forces. Is that where it should be? Venqax ( talk) 02:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is Chief Warrant Officer (CWO) a separate article covering information already contained within the Warrant Officer article? Not to mention that the term "Chief Warrant Officer" is not exclusive to the Canadian armed forces. ( Born2flie 04:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC))
I have recommended a merge. ( Born2flie 05:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC))
I am informally suggesting that this page, Chief Petty Officer 1st Class, Regimental Sergeant-Major, and Warrant Officer be combined into a single article named Warrant Officer (Canada). ALthough the CPOs are not "called" WOs, they still have the same priveleges and entitlements, and thus would be better covered together. Comments before a formal porposal? - BillCJ 23:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I somehow doubt that the slip-on insigne for a chief warrant officer would feature the text "CADET". Can somebody check the correctness of this please? 85.178.75.53 ( talk) 19:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Able Seaman (rank) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 23:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chief warrant officer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/resourcelibrary/cyberpioneer/topics/articles/news/2012/jun/29jun12_news2.htmllWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
In the Forms of Address section, this makes no sense: "In the RCN, CWOs are never addressed as "Chief", this being a form of address reserved for chief petty officers." In the RCN, CWOs ARE chief petty officers. Chief petty officers first class, precisely. This statement would be true for the US Armed Forces. Is that where it should be? Venqax ( talk) 02:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)